On Aug 2, 4:45=A0pm, 01dyna <01d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:13:23 -0400, Retired VIP
>
>
>
>
>
> <jackj.extradots....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you wrote:
> >On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT), r.andrew...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> >> Neither does E85 it does none of that those are all false hoods. It
> >>is clear you don't know much about E85 or ethanol for that matter.
> >>Ethanol was the first fuel ever used in a vehicle and then it was
> >>electric. We only switched to fossil fuels because it cost more and we
> >>could make more money off them. E85 is the safest best way to fuel
> >>your car and our economy for our environment and for our dependence on
> >>foreign oil. We had an electric car but that used no oil so they
> >>killed that car watch the do***entary death of the electric car. No
> >>negatives to E85 almost make you wonder why they put these false hoods
> >>out? Oh and they do have tractors they use E85 Diesel fuel.
>
> >English isn't your first language, is it?
>
> apparently, not even his second.
>
> Two seconds doing a google search and anyone can find out just how bad
> of an idea ethanol is, both for our cars AND our economy.- Hide quoted
te=
xt -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Its good if it is not in major competition with a basic food we and
livestock eat. Isnt it Brazill that is self sufficent on alcohol for
e85, but this is from cane sugar, not food stocks and from newly
cleared jungle.
|
