On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:58:37 -0700, ransley wrote:
> On Aug 2, 4:45Â pm, 01dyna <01d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:13:23 -0400, Retired VIP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <jackj.extradots....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you wrote:
>> >On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT), r.andrew...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>> >> Neither does E85 it does none of that those are all false hoods. It
>> >>is clear you don't know much about E85 or ethanol for that matter.
>> >>Ethanol was the first fuel ever used in a vehicle and then it was
>> >>electric. We only switched to fossil fuels because it cost more and
we
>> >>could make more money off them. E85 is the safest best way to fuel
>> >>your car and our economy for our environment and for our dependence
on
>> >>foreign oil. We had an electric car but that used no oil so they
>> >>killed that car watch the do***entary death of the electric car. No
>> >>negatives to E85 almost make you wonder why they put these false
hoods
>> >>out? Oh and they do have tractors they use E85 Diesel fuel.
>>
>> >English isn't your first language, is it?
>>
>> apparently, not even his second.
>>
>> Two seconds doing a google search and anyone can find out just how bad
>> of an idea ethanol is, both for our cars AND our economy.- Hide quoted
text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Its good if it is not in major competition with a basic food we and
> livestock eat. Isnt it Brazill that is self sufficent on alcohol for
> e85, but this is from cane sugar, not food stocks and from newly
> cleared jungle.
Yeah. They get the ethanol from cane sugar and scraps, like you said. E85
is pretty much a way of life there.


|