Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists

Jack May wrote:
> "donquijote1954" <nolionnoproblem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>
news:41f30ecb-9b61-46f4-b144-20b20107e322@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> Exactly right. The statistics won't lie: 3,000 at the Towers (a one
>> time event) vs. 40,000 on the road every year, of which 25,000 could
>> be saved if we were to have the safety rates of Sweden.
>>
>> Yet people are told that the issue is terrorism and not road
>> terrorism. They take the picture of your *** going through the
>> air****t, but fail to put a speed camera at troublesome spots. It's
>> like they don't care...
> 
> You are assuming that speed is the main cause of road deaths which is 
> extremely unlikely.  So you don't have any approach to reduce road
deaths.
> 
> What is being developed and will be on the market in five or so years is
car 
> to car digital communications.   The communications between cars will be

> used to prevent accidents and deaths.
> 
> Like commercial aircraft, the drivers will be warned to take evasive
action 
> an what action should be taken.   In extreme cases the electronics in
the 
> cars will automatically take actions to control the cars to prevent the 
> accidents.[...]

How will this prevent the cagers from squi****ng cyclists, pedestrians 
and animals? Will all of the latter have to be equipped with transponders?

If motor vehicles are developed that will not hit each others, that will 
make the cagers even more careless about cyclists and pedestrians.

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful