Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Autos General > Re: Reckless, A...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 55 of 69 Topic 4999 of 5176
Post > Topic >>

Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists

by Martin Edwards <big_mart_98@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 21, 2008 at 09:17 AM

Tom Sherman wrote:
> Jack May wrote:
>> "donquijote1954" <nolionnoproblem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>
news:41f30ecb-9b61-46f4-b144-20b20107e322@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Exactly right. The statistics won't lie: 3,000 at the Towers (a one
>>> time event) vs. 40,000 on the road every year, of which 25,000 could
>>> be saved if we were to have the safety rates of Sweden.
>>>
>>> Yet people are told that the issue is terrorism and not road
>>> terrorism. They take the picture of your *** going through the
>>> air****t, but fail to put a speed camera at troublesome spots. It's
>>> like they don't care...
>>
>> You are assuming that speed is the main cause of road deaths which is 
>> extremely unlikely.  So you don't have any approach to reduce road 
>> deaths.
>>
>> What is being developed and will be on the market in five or so years 
>> is car to car digital communications.   The communications between 
>> cars will be used to prevent accidents and deaths.
>>
>> Like commercial aircraft, the drivers will be warned to take evasive 
>> action an what action should be taken.   In extreme cases the 
>> electronics in the cars will automatically take actions to control the 
>> cars to prevent the accidents.[...]
> 
> How will this prevent the cagers from squi****ng cyclists, pedestrians 
> and animals? Will all of the latter have to be equipped with
transponders?
> 
> If motor vehicles are developed that will not hit each others, that will

> make the cagers even more careless about cyclists and pedestrians.
> 
Back in the 1950s in cycle training I was told to take up a space on the 
  road and not ride in the gutter.  The result was that I was constantly 
hooted by motorists for being in their way.  Imagine that combined with 
a system where they can whizz about ad lib in no danger of hurting 
themselves or each other.

-- 
Cor****ate society looks after everything.  All it asks of anyone, all it 
has ever asked of anyone, is that they do not interfere with management 
decisions.  -From “Rollerball”
 




 69 Posts in Topic:
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-20 20:33:39 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-20 22:37:04 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-20 21:03:37 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-20 23:29:58 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:20:03 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-21 07:37:20 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:07:40 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:16:45 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 18:56:07 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:39:53 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-27 08:39:05 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 16:07:48 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-27 20:07:08 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-27 21:38:03 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 20:23:21 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 07:55:58 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 08:39:53 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 11:05:16 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 01:14:44 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 22:14:55 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 01:04:37 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-28 16:48:30 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-28 17:30:19 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 20:33:12 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-03-01 07:39:00 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-01 08:06:15 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 07:18:05 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-03-01 09:00:13 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 22:43:15 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-28 16:50:07 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-29 03:01:28 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-04 09:01:30 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-04 15:55:57 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:13:21 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-22 22:21:20 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 22:37:38 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-02 11:58:42 
Re: HIGH TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE *NOT* PUT TO USE
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-22 16:32:09 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:11:45 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:04:46 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-22 16:33:18 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-22 11:46:26 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:16:22 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:18:39 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:11:31 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-21 09:26:18 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 18:59:39 
Re: our presidential campaign
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 19:02:04 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 07:16:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 14:25:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 23:59:49 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:24:25 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@  2008-02-24 09:30:51 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-24 17:03:07 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:17:32 
Re: our presidential campaign
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 22:29:53 
Re: our presidential campaign
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-23 08:58:04 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-23 18:54:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-23 21:32:30 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Bonehenge (B A R R   2008-02-24 22:45:39 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Bonehenge (B A R R   2008-02-24 17:55:40 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-24 18:33:55 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-25 11:08:37 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-25 13:52:05 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-25 17:00:39 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-25 18:45:25 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 21:48:53 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-27 21:12:06 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-24 14:02:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 0:35:01 CDT 2008.