Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists

Martin Edwards wrote:
> Tom Sherman wrote:
>> Jack May wrote:
>>> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:fpiv5h$g12$5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>>> "donquijote1954" <nolionnoproblem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>>>
news:41f30ecb-9b61-46f4-b144-20b20107e322@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>>>>
>>>> How will this prevent the cagers from squi****ng cyclists, 
>>>> pedestrians and animals? Will all of the latter have to be equipped 
>>>> with transponders?
>>>
>>> Probably.  I think we are talking about a single chip.  Since most 
>>> people carry a cell phone with them these day with location 
>>> electronics, maybe the law requires a transponder capability like the 
>>> law now require location to be determined by each cell phone for 911 
>>> responses.
>>>
>>>> If motor vehicles are developed that will not hit each others, that 
>>>> will make the cagers even more careless about cyclists and
pedestrians.
>>>
>>> We are heading to the where the car will not be able to easily hit 
>>> anything with a transponder, including people and pets.   The car 
>>> will automatically brake for example to keep from hitting a child 
>>> that runs out into the road. That should not be hard once 
>>> transponders become common.
>>>
>>> Congress people really want the capability for "zero deaths" on the 
>>> road that they can brag about pu****ng when running for reelections.  
>>> Zero death is probably impossible even though we are getting near 
>>> that for large passenger jets.
>>>
>> All that is needed is adding microphones and cameras to the 
>> transponders - then the government can achieve the long awaited goal 
>> of regulating behavior of people in their homes behind closed doors.
>>
> Scheiss, imagine Jack's tv shouting out, "Mr May, stop that or you will 
> go blind!"

That would only happen during a GM commercial.  WTF is this thread doing 
in a transit group anyway?  Jack's a troll.