Re: Beware of high tech running amok

In article <john-80127C.22411225022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
John A. Weeks III wrote:
> In article <LOCdndwGhpv6F17anZ2dnUVZ_sPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P) wrote:
> 
>> >> -- Keyless push-button ignition systems: How about inserting a key
and 
>> >> twisting it?
>>  
>> > I challenge you to find one person in America that would give up
>> > keyless door locks and trade in the clicker for a key.  I bet you
>> > cannot find anyone, at least no one who isn't taking lots of meds.
>> 
>> I've never had keyless entry. I don't really have a desire for it
either. 
> 
> Replace the word "keyless" entry with "***", and see how foolish
> that logic sounds when you say it out loud.  Just because you
> haven't tried something doesn't mean that you will not enjoy it
> once you have had it, and thus, you desire it again in the future.

Why do I want more crap to carry around, another thing to break, another 
thing that needs a battery... For what advantage? Not putting a key into 
a lock? Then I'd never really trust the security of it. If it had a door 
lock as a backup it couldn't be more secure, if it didn't when the 
battery fails or the remote breaks one would be SOL.