Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Autos General > Re: Beware of h...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 113 Topic 5011 of 5143
Post > Topic >>

Re: Beware of high tech running amok

by tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent P) Feb 26, 2008 at 11:48 PM

In article <02g9s35r5gmcl9e7p8r0an9fum4lshd68m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Scott in SoCal
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:36:03 -0600, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Brent P) wrote:
> 
>>In article <la88s35it4mk8rku0hcc5gaqgks26alllq@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Scott in SoCal
wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:02:28 -0600, tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> (Brent P) wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Why do I want more crap to carry around
>>> 
>>> Huh? You already carry a key on a chain with a fob. Where is this
>>> "extra crap" of which you speak?
>>
>>I have no 'fob'. 
> 
> Most people do. You're just weird. Especially if you consider a key
> fob weighing an ounce or two to be some sort of an unbearable burden.

I thought I was clear I consider it an annoyance. 

>>>>another thing that needs a battery... 
>>
>>> My first battery lasted almost 3 years and cost $3 to replace. BFD.
>>
>>It's not the cost, it's the annoyance. 

> Keys are more annoying than fobs - especially when the weather gets
> cold and icy.

Except for the torqueless wonder car I haven't had that problem in about 
14 years. 
  
>>And makes your car easy to steal by some RFID interceptor.
 
> Kindly link to a re****t of a Corvette, an IS-350, a Mercedes, or any
> other vehicle that was soltne in this manner. I'll wait.

I understand thieves eventually defeated the ford PATS system too... 
 
>>Easy low tech solution: Spare key in wallet duh. 

> Luddite. 

No. Keep it Simple, Stupid. 

> Do you keep a bottle of lock de-icer in your wallet too?

Why would I need that? 
 
>>Only I drive my car. 

> And you're never getting married or even having an SO.

Find me a woman under 35 years old that can drive three on the tree and 
then I'll be concerned about it. 
 
>>> Another thing you might appreciate on occasion: my car has no lock
>>> cylinders in the doors to get frozen up in the winter. :)

>>It's called graphite lock lube. I've had to do it ONCE in 11 years. 
 
> Amazing. You tell us that your brakes fail constantly, and yet you've
> never had your locks freeze up on you? When I lived in IL, I had it
> happen at least once a year.

Strawman. I've had brake lines fail in hidden unservicable uninspectable 
locations on cars over 15 years old. It's called road salt spray. Door
locks 
however give signals that they are in need of lube and preventing them 
from icing over isn't a big deal. Now my '73 and '75 mavericks when I did 
drive them daily over 11 years ago, would have the *latches* freeze up 
but not the lock cylinders. Of course your key fob thinggy doesn't take 
the latch out of the system.
 




 113 Posts in Topic:
Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-25 16:59:45 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Arif Khokar <akhokar12  2008-02-25 22:48:20 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Shawn Hirn <srhi@[EMAI  2008-02-26 05:53:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-27 11:16:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
necromancer <55_sux@[E  2008-02-25 18:10:24 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-25 18:59:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-25 21:41:27 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-25 22:41:12 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-25 22:48:19 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-25 21:21:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-26 13:03:43 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-26 02:13:11 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-26 13:09:24 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-25 23:02:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John A. Weeks III&q  2008-02-26 02:14:55 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-26 07:14:18 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-26 06:40:16 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-26 09:36:03 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-26 17:52:29 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-26 23:48:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-02-27 07:10:23 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 07:00:31 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 06:30:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 09:03:59 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-02-27 10:05:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-27 15:08:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 06:27:13 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 09:02:26 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 21:01:45 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 23:10:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 22:00:45 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 15:55:19 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 14:52:05 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 17:01:06 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 11:47:49 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 11:54:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 15:05:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL   2008-02-28 05:46:13 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-27 08:58:23 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-27 06:44:35 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 09:06:54 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 19:29:56 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:46:39 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 19:40:02 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:54:22 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-28 05:21:37 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Krhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 18:22:12 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 12:41:50 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 18:12:41 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:31:41 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-28 17:11:32 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 18:14:27 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:04:04 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
gpsman <gpsman@[EMAIL   2008-02-28 00:11:29 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-25 20:53:36 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Krhodes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 18:39:50 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
MLOM <grvan@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-25 21:23:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Harry K <turnkey4099@[  2008-02-26 08:37:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Harry K <turnkey4099@[  2008-02-26 08:52:12 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-26 11:58:58 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 05:45:38 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-27 15:11:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 05:47:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 07:45:04 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-28 08:11:32 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-28 06:17:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
ray <rollingviolation@  2008-02-28 15:04:09 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Roger Blake <rogblake1  2008-02-29 04:41:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 07:48:41 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ray <ray@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-28 08:15:47 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 11:44:24 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 11:51:20 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 15:23:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 15:26:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 18:05:26 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-27 22:20:35 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:50:01 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 16:01:20 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 18:19:26 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 19:55:22 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 16:11:36 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 18:28:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 16:54:33 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-28 19:00:44 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-27 17:01:27 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 19:33:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Ed Pirrero <gcmschemis  2008-02-28 17:11:40 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-27 17:22:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@  2008-02-27 21:04:34 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-29 06:14:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"HLS" <nospa  2008-02-26 01:02:39 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Shawn Hirn <srhi@[EMAI  2008-02-26 05:50:56 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"benteaches@[EMAIL P  2008-02-26 09:24:05 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"*" <nospam@  2008-02-27 09:47:21 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-02-27 12:55:25 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-27 14:56:18 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
z <gzuckier@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-27 11:14:47 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-27 13:20:49 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-27 17:46:06 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-27 15:34:38 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"Ed White" <  2008-02-27 22:38:28 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-28 07:46:51 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-03-03 17:19:14 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-04 12:22:35 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-28 16:22:44 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-03-01 13:23:55 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"C. E. White" &  2008-03-03 17:38:19 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"benteaches@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 09:27:37 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
"John S." <h  2008-02-28 16:26:15 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
Scott in SoCal <scotte  2008-02-28 20:41:42 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
disston <cgwix@[EMAIL   2008-02-29 08:17:07 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
N8N <njnagel@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-29 10:15:23 
Re: Beware of high tech running amok
russotto@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-29 20:19:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 3:10:50 CDT 2008.