Re: Beware of high tech running amok

In article
<8299cb5c-4240-4fc4-bfb8-527a5c11547e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed
Pirrero wrote:
> On Feb 27, 4:28 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P)
> wrote:
>> In article
<0c038c8f-35aa-4b9a-894d-d5badf71d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed
Pirrero wrote:
>> > On Feb 27, 4:05 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P)
>> > wrote:
>> >> In article
<34b87ba9-c84f-4a0d-a38e-856539135...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed
Pirrero wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 27, 7:02 am, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P)
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> In article <rbsas356ecr4p71ih7jcn8j061bhkfc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Scott in
SoCal wrote:
>>
>> >> >> How many times
>> >> >> have I made something up out of the blue scott? ZERO. Ya think
there
>> >> >> would be just a little respect.
>> >> > LOL.  That's reason you don't get respect.  If the conclusions you
>> >> > reached made sense from the data you presented, you *would* get
>> >> > respect.
>>
>> >> You mean like...[snipped argumentative crap]
>>
>> > Yeah, just like that.  Or whatever.  Obviously you never have thought
>> > about it much.
>> > The fact that you happen to hit on a few true facts every now and
then
>> > isn't surprising.  Hell, anyone with as much free time as you seem to
>> > have might find some nuggets of truth.  Just from the sheer volume of
>> > crap you spew out, some good must come.  Sorta like fertilizer, I
>> > guess.
>> > Instead of knee-jerk defensive sermonizing, why not examine the why
of
>> > why you seem to get so little respect.  Even when you do actually
>> > present true facts.
>>
>> That was predictable.... Like always I produce the cite and like always
>> you spew insults back.

> Maybe it's because of your ****y, paranoid attitude?

Such projection. I mean really, why are you so concerned about a kook (if 
that's what I am) that you react in such a vile, paranoid (that someone 
might take me seriously) manner? 

> Maybe it's because of the natural tendency of folks to disbelieve
> someone who obviously has a bigger agenda?

What would that 'agenda' be? 
 
> Or maybe it's because you are generally abrasive, holier-than-thou and
> incredibly defensive, all at the same time?

Abrasive? From the guy who spews insults as a habbit? 
Holier than thou? From the guy who gives logic lessons in belittling 
tones frequently? 
Defensive? From the guy who likes to go on the personal insult attack 
when he can't argue the subject any longer? 

That's some good projection there Ed. I tend to mirror the person I'm 
dealing with. Had that pointed out by recruiter once who was evaluating 
my interviewing skills. I've since realized it was correct. You're 
abrasive, holier-than-thou, and defensive to me so you get it right back. 

> The reason you have so much free time is abundantly clear.

lol....

The problem is actually quite the opposite a lack of free time that has me

stuck at a computer.