Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Autos General > Re: Cell phone ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 67 of 69 Topic 4999 of 5143
Post > Topic >>

Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving

by Eric Vey <junker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 27, 2008 at 09:48 PM

Pat wrote:

> 
> Gee, I wish. I remembe when it wasn't legal to have an answering
> machine or fax on a land line.  Those things, too, were illegal.
> Stupid, stupid laws.

Gee, Pat, then you would remember other "stupid, stupid laws" 
trans****tation that I remember.

Such as, the requirement that all lead in gas be removed. Remember that 
one, Pat?  Some people declared it a "stupid, stupid law" and put in 
"test pipes" to replace the catalytic convertor in their cars.

Then there was the "stupid, stupid law" that required -- required, mind 
you -- seatbelts be put in all cars manufactured in the US after 1967. 
Remember that Pat? I do. People weren't being to required to wear them, 
just that they were there and that was a "stupid, stupid law" or so said 
many people.

Do you drive around without wearing your seatbelt, Pat? Then good for 
you. One-third of the drivers are with you and don't. Personally, I 
don't care if you ever wear a seatbelt -- people reading of your demise 
will say things like "gee, if he had only been wearing his seatbelt . . 
.." even though your spleen was busted by the collision and wearing a 
seatbelt wouldn't have meant beans.

Here is one for you, another "stupid, stupid law." The open container 
law. back when I was a kid, it was common for people to buy a six-pack 
and not wait until they got home to start in on it. They weren't drunk 
after the one or two they had on the way home, but that didn't matter 
under the open container law.

I always thought that OSHA was a waste of time. Another "stupid, stupid 
law." After all, if someone worked in a dangerous job, they could quit 
it. And the EPA was another "stupid, stupid law." If your next door 
neighbor polluted your well, who were you to complain?

These are just a few of  the "stupid, stupid laws" others before you 
have found fault with. I'm sure I can think of others, but I am getting 
old and just can't remember everything the way I am sure you can.
 




 69 Posts in Topic:
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-20 20:33:39 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-20 22:37:04 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-20 21:03:37 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-20 23:29:58 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:20:03 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-21 07:37:20 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:07:40 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:16:45 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 18:56:07 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:39:53 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-27 08:39:05 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 16:07:48 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-27 20:07:08 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-27 21:38:03 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 20:23:21 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 07:55:58 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 08:39:53 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 11:05:16 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 01:14:44 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 22:14:55 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 01:04:37 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-28 16:48:30 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-28 17:30:19 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 20:33:12 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-03-01 07:39:00 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-01 08:06:15 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 07:18:05 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-03-01 09:00:13 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 22:43:15 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-28 16:50:07 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-29 03:01:28 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-04 09:01:30 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-04 15:55:57 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:13:21 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-22 22:21:20 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 22:37:38 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-02 11:58:42 
Re: HIGH TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE *NOT* PUT TO USE
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-22 16:32:09 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:11:45 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:04:46 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-22 16:33:18 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-22 11:46:26 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:16:22 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:18:39 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:11:31 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-21 09:26:18 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 18:59:39 
Re: our presidential campaign
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 19:02:04 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 07:16:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 14:25:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 23:59:49 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:24:25 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@  2008-02-24 09:30:51 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-24 17:03:07 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:17:32 
Re: our presidential campaign
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 22:29:53 
Re: our presidential campaign
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-23 08:58:04 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-23 18:54:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-23 21:32:30 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Bonehenge (B A R R   2008-02-24 22:45:39 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Bonehenge (B A R R   2008-02-24 17:55:40 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-24 18:33:55 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-25 11:08:37 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-25 13:52:05 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-25 17:00:39 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-25 18:45:25 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 21:48:53 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-27 21:12:06 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-24 14:02:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 22:12:14 CDT 2008.