Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists

Jack May wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:fq2sj7$bl9$5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Jack May wrote:
>>> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:fpo880$65s$3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>>> "donquijote1954" <nolionnoproblem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>>>
news:f27c6d4e-5a05-4d62-ace1-f563de6670cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Feb 21, 12:57 am, Miles Bader <miles.ba...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>>>> In Jack's Utopia new tecknologies won't pollute and big SUVs won't
> 
>> Nonsense. Now Jack May is just making things up.
> 
> I gave the statistics URL only a few weeks ago but since you only want
to 
> lie, you are not worth my time to find it again.
>>> Since you are playing ignorant again, riding a bike require eating
more 
>>> food.   Food takes a lot of energy in the entire cycle to grow, 
>>> trans****t, clean up that does that does pollute.
>> The amount of extra food consumed by a cyclist contributes relatively 
>> little to pollution compared to operating a 2 ton SUV.
> 
> A bike gets about 650 MPG in calorie equivalents.   Food takes on
average 
> about 8 times it caloric energy in oil to grow, trans****t, etc.  For
some 
> food flown in as is often done these days, the factor is tens of times
more.
> 
> Again I gave URLs only a few weeks ago.  Since your only goal in life
seems 
> to be to lie about everything, it is not worth my time to keep
correcting 
> you.
> 
Bloody delusional. How much freaking oil does it take to build a car, 
extract and refine the additional oil to fuel it, trans****t the fuel to 
the station, etc.

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful