Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving

Jack May wrote:
> "Bolwerk" <bolwerk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:13s8er2qjm26s5d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Martin Edwards wrote:
>>> donquijote1954 wrote:
>>>> On Feb 24, 6:59 pm, Eric Vey <jun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> donquijote1954 wrote:
> 
>> It's probably because it doesn't take a genius to see that much of 
>> California was/is an environmental disaster.  It's not as bad as it
was, 
>> but that many cars just isn't environmentally friendly. 
(Interestingly, 
>> California is on the lower end of the scale when it comes to greenhouse

>> gases per person.)
> 
> More of your retarded nutcase crap.  Cars have become extremely clean,
even 
> cleaner than required by law.   The problem now in California is transit

> which is extremely dirty with diesel particulates degrading health. 
That is 
> why California is mandating testing hydrogen busses to try and solve the

> transit pollution problem.
> 
> NYC of course has a bunch of diesel hybrid busses which are cleaner than

> normal but far too dirty to be approved for use in California.
> 
> BTW, according to Top Gear on BBC America ****sche and maybe some other 
> brands sell some car models that have negative pollution.   In places
like 
> LA, the air coming out of the tail pipe has less pollution than the air 
> going into the engine.   None of your filthy transit can come anywhere
near 
> that performance.
> 
No CO2 emissions?

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful