Re: Beware of high tech running amok

On Feb 27, 7:04=A0pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Brent P)
wrote:
> In article
<7458b50a-a17a-4859-b1b4-f6535bff7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Ed Pirrero wrote:
> >> Such projection.
>
> > You're a psychologist? =A0I thought you said you were an engineer?
> > Which is it?
>
> I thought you were some sort of chemist or something in that field, it
> doesn't seem to stop you.

Stop me...what?  Stop me from making claims of knowledge of
psychology?  I don't think I've ever claimed that, anywhere.

It does stop me from making claims that I'm somehow a reflection of
who I'm talking to - even if I've been acting that way prior to that
other person even showing up!

LOL.

"It's not my fault - you MAKE me act like an asshole!"

That's the best one yet.  Your **** is literally LOL-funny.

But seriously.  I mean, really - I'm giving the straight dope on why
you seem to get so little respect, even from long-timers.  Even Nate
admits that you have a certain attitude.

I suppose that once you grow up and stop blaming others for your
shortcomings, you may actually be able to address how folks who should
nominally be your allies reject your spewing a significant fraction of
the time.

I doubt you'll think too long about it.  But hey - I only know you
from what you post here.  And while I think that knocking back a
couple of brews and talking cars with most of these other folks would
be fun, every second spent with you would be a chore.

And likewise, I'm sure, huh?  LOL.

E.P.