Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving

"Eric Vey" <junker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fq596l$ed3$2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jack May wrote:
>
> What law? Why would we need such "stupid, stupid laws" if the market 
> "cleaned up" things on it's own?

I said absolutely nothing like that.
>
> Oh, yeah. Car manufacturers took it upon themselves to clean up the 
> environment. They didn't need the government to push them, did they?

That is exactly what the data shows.   Probably what happened is that with

present design software it is cost effective to design for low pollution. 
With good software, maybe there is no payoff to design for higher
pollution.

You are a total loser wanting to claim conspiracy everywhere, but there is

some data at:

http://www.highways.org/Mar06-speaker-slideshows/Schwartz.ppt#15

It is well known that the cheapest way to reduce pollution is to get
people 
to replace their cars with newer cars.