Re: Beware of high tech running amok

On Feb 28, 8:21 am, N8N <njna...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Feb 28, 3:11 am, gpsman <gps...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 27, 8:22 pm, N8N <njna...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > I think a lot of Brent's "attitude"
> > > comes from year after year, people (both in RAD in the general
public
> > > as a whole) disregarding facts, studies, and even common sense and
> > > displaying a noted lack of critical thinking skills about a variety
of
> > > issues, traffic law and enforcement being an obvious, notable
> > > example.
>
> > Heh... like Brent being ignorant of the law WRT to turn signals...?
>
> unsup****ted assertion.
>
>
>
> > > Once you get past Brent's delivery, which I generally
> > > interpret as exasperation after years of bringing up the same points
> > > again and again, I find myself agreeing with him quite a bit.
>
> > He's an obvious paranoid idiot,
>
> unsup****ted assertion
>
> > can't drive for ****,
>
> unsup****ted assertion
>
> > re****ts a
> > perfectly unbelievable number of encounters with LE, tickets, and
> > being involved in numerous "incidents"... so this doesn't seem to be
> > the revelation of a genius, to me.
>
> unsup****ted assertion
>
>
>
> > > Most people are so completely ignorant of the way things
> > > *should* be <>
>
> > Lol.  Most people aren't so ignorant that they think the world should
> > conform to the way they think "things" "should be"...
>
> Most people *are* ignorant.  You being a perfect example.
>
>
>
> > > What's really sad is, once upon a time, as you state, the majority
(or
> > > at least a significant and prolific minority) of RAD posters were
> > > knowledgable about driving<>
>
> > How the **** do you think you would know that...?!
>
> Because I consider myself one of those people.  Probably not the most
> experienced or practiced in the finer points of car control, but I
> know enough that I can tell when someone is full of it and when
> someone is actually offering good advice.
>
>
>
> > What you mean is- "they agree with you".
>
> What I mean is that they offer intelligent, correct advice.
>
> It's possible to have a difference of opinion with someone who has a
> valid point.  On the flip side, it's also possible to have a
> difference of opinion with someone who's flat wrong, which seems to be
> more common here (RAD) lately.
>
>
>
> > And you all have roughly the same driver education, little or
> > effectively none,
>
> unsup****ted assertion
>
> > which you have admittedly ignored and/or failed to
> > commit to memory,
>
> unsup****ted assertion
>
> > and you all get roughly the same driving experience,
> > about 10-12 hours per week, if you're lucky.
>
> unsup****ted assertion, and in my case flat wrong.
>
> > ****, you've re****ted your gauges are a "distraction", and you lack
> > the skill to steer and monitor your speedometer.
>
> unsup****ted assertion
>
>
>
> > And, you are ignorant enough to believe you and they are
> > "knowledgeable"...?!
>
> wow, you've outdone yourself.  That's more stupid than I thought even
> you could cram into one post.

Said the genius who needs sup****t to recall what he himself has
written...

I guess you don't remember citing completing an "introductory class"
as an advanced driving "course" either.

> Anyone notice the irony in gpstard using the same tactic that he likes
> to "call" other people on?

Lol.  Calling for help...?  From those "who agree with you."...?

Figgers.  You're not only stupid, you're a *****.

And, you forgot to call me a "troll".

BUHWAHAhahaha...!
 -----

- gpsman