Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Autos General > Re: when 70% of...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 31 of 69 Topic 4999 of 5141
Post > Topic >>

Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road

by gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Feb 29, 2008 at 03:01 AM

In article <13seb5of08sal2c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "George Conklin"
<nil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> <gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:gl4316-2702082243150001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <4aCdnYkldZzUZljanZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Jack May"
> > <jack.may@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > <gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:gl4316-2602081939530001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > In article <H6WdnUYpstYkpCPanZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Jack
May"
> > > > <jack.may@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Your comments only apply to North America, where transit systems
are
> > > > designed to be failures by consultants who drive everywhere.
> > > >
> > > > In the rest of the world, transit systems have been developed that
are
> > > > competitive with driving, and therefore render these expensive
highway
> > > > systems unnecessary in the first place.
> > >
> > > What the hell are you talking about.   In Europe cars are almost 90%
 of
> the
> > > travel and transit is only a little over 10%.  What you are saying
is
> > > totally nuts.
> >
> >
> > You have made this comment many times before and have been proven
wrong.
> 
>    Now you are back to your "I've proven you wrong" rant, when your only
> evidence is your pathetic comments you know are fake from the start. 
Then
> you state everyone but you misquotes sources and so forth and so on.


Neither you nor Jack has quoted any sources, so I have not made any such
claims about misquoted sources.  One can't argue with statistics that
appear out of nowhere.  I am only providing a blanket statement as to why
such a figure that covers "Europe" (which, by the geographical definition,
nearly 50% of which is made of Russian farmland) which Jack provided isn't
particularly relevant to urban areas of western Europe.

OK, so maybe the correct way of phrasing what I wrote shouldn't be "You
have made this statement before many times and been proven wrong."  This
is considerable oversimplification, but it is also in response to a
statistic that is irrelevant to the statement I typed.

What I should have said was "You have made this statement before many
times, which has been proven irrelevant."

The statement that Jack May has made before and has been proven incorrect
has been the statements that "Transit use is declining all over Europe." 
He was able to prove that market share in all of Europe (including areas
that are still transitioning out of communism) is decreasing, which is to
be expected.  However, what was shown to be true is that in many areas of
western Europe (that is, locations where efforts are being made to improve
the quality of transit and auto owner****p is well established) that
transit market share is actually increasing.

So, the statement of cars being 90% of the travel in Europe isn't
necessarily incorrect, but it is a completely inaccurate picture that is
presented in response to my statements of what is really going on.

-- 
-Glennl
e-mail hint: add 1 to quantity after gl to get 4317.
 




 69 Posts in Topic:
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-20 20:33:39 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-20 22:37:04 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-20 21:03:37 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-20 23:29:58 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:20:03 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-21 07:37:20 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:07:40 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:16:45 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 18:56:07 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:39:53 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-27 08:39:05 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 16:07:48 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-27 20:07:08 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-27 21:38:03 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 20:23:21 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 07:55:58 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 08:39:53 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 11:05:16 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 01:14:44 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 22:14:55 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-02-28 01:04:37 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-28 16:48:30 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-28 17:30:19 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-28 20:33:12 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-03-01 07:39:00 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-01 08:06:15 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 07:18:05 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-03-01 09:00:13 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 22:43:15 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
"George Conklin"  2008-02-28 16:50:07 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
gl4316@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-29 03:01:28 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-04 09:01:30 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-04 15:55:57 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:13:21 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-22 22:21:20 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 22:37:38 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-02 11:58:42 
Re: HIGH TECHNOLOGIES THAT ARE *NOT* PUT TO USE
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-22 16:32:09 
Re: when 70% of drivers are banned from the road
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:11:45 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:04:46 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-22 16:33:18 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-22 11:46:26 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 21:16:22 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:18:39 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:11:31 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-21 09:26:18 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 18:59:39 
Re: our presidential campaign
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 19:02:04 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 07:16:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 14:25:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-24 23:59:49 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
"Jack May" <  2008-02-21 17:24:25 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@  2008-02-24 09:30:51 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-24 17:03:07 
Re: Reckless, Aggressive Drivers: Homegrown Terrorists
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-21 09:17:32 
Re: our presidential campaign
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-22 22:29:53 
Re: our presidential campaign
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-23 08:58:04 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-23 18:54:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-23 21:32:30 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Bonehenge (B A R R   2008-02-24 22:45:39 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Bonehenge (B A R R   2008-02-24 17:55:40 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-24 18:33:55 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-25 11:08:37 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-25 13:52:05 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-02-25 17:00:39 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-25 18:45:25 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 21:48:53 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-02-27 21:12:06 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-24 14:02:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 21:05:13 CDT 2008.