Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Autos General > Re: High popula...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 32 of 40 Topic 5015 of 5176
Post > Topic >>

Re: High population density is good for bikes

by James Robinson <wascana@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 5, 2008 at 10:10 PM

"George Conklin" <nil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> "Bolwerk" <bolwerk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> Eric Vey wrote:
>> >
>> > One would think that Pat and Jack would want the city slickers to
>> > use less gas. That way the demand would go down and thus the price
>> > for them. So I really don't understand their whole line of reasoning.
>>
>> Pat just seems to like to whine, but Jack apparently thinks transit
>> systems should be shut down and everybody should be forced to drive.
>> Therefore, "city slickers" would be using more gas and wasting more
>> energy.  Then, no one ever accused Jack of making sense.
> 
> Transit systems don't save fuel so your comments, as usual, are mean
> just for the sake of being mean.

Transit systems save energy in comparison to comparable trips by auto/SUV,

and your comments, as usual, are plain wrong.
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-02-27 21:49:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-27 12:15:08 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 16:22:47 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 21:56:52 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 01:09:54 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-28 08:35:54 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 14:10:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Jack May" <  2008-03-01 20:19:42 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-02 15:19:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-03-02 10:22:41 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-03 14:40:42 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Nobody <jock@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-07 01:48:00 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-05 16:46:18 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 20:19:42 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-05 21:23:26 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 23:28:26 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:16:48 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-06 08:29:35 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:15:31 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-06 03:46:05 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-06 08:31:16 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-06 10:22:40 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-06 10:25:40 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-06 14:03:42 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-06 12:37:46 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-08 01:34:36 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-03 10:19:05 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Miles Bader <miles.bad  2008-03-05 12:15:00 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-05 02:06:31 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 11:30:52 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
"George Conklin"  2008-03-05 16:11:04 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
James Robinson <wascan  2008-03-05 22:10:15 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
"George Conklin"  2008-03-05 19:15:22 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
James Robinson <wascan  2008-03-06 00:24:22 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:08:18 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 20:22:16 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:09:22 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:07:01 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-09 15:06:31 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-06 10:05:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 4:05:20 CDT 2008.