Re: High population density is good for bikes

"George Conklin" <nil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> 
> "James Robinson" <wascana@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A58AEA8334C2wascana212com@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "George Conklin" <nil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >
>> > "Bolwerk" <bolwerk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Eric Vey wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > One would think that Pat and Jack would want the city slickers
>> >> > to use less gas. That way the demand would go down and thus the
>> >> > price for them. So I really don't understand their whole line of
>> >> > reasoning. 
>> >>
>> >> Pat just seems to like to whine, but Jack apparently thinks
>> >> transit systems should be shut down and everybody should be forced
>> >> to drive. Therefore, "city slickers" would be using more gas and
>> >> wasting more energy.  Then, no one ever accused Jack of making
>> >> sense. 
>> >
>> > Transit systems don't save fuel so your comments, as usual, are
>> > mean just for the sake of being mean.
>>
>> Transit systems save energy in comparison to comparable trips by
>> auto/SUV, and your comments, as usual, are plain wrong.
> 
> Which as you know is incorrect, but you keep posting the lies.

Nope.  I keep posting the data over and over again, and you keep ignoring 
it, clinging to a discredited article printed in Access sometime ago in 
ancient history.