Re: High population density is good for bikes

Bolwerk wrote:
> George Conklin wrote:
>> "Bolwerk" <bolwerk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:13stinng5rn3h58@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Eric Vey wrote:
>>>> Miles Bader wrote:
>>>>> Pat <groups@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>>>> Woohoo.  Where I live
>>>>> You don't count, Pat.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Miles
>>>>>
>>>> One would think that Pat and Jack would want the city slickers to use
>>>> less gas. That way the demand would go down and thus the price for 
>>>> them.
>>>>  So I really don't understand their whole line of reasoning.
>>> Pat just seems to like to whine, but Jack apparently thinks transit
>>> systems should be shut down and everybody should be forced to drive.
>>> Therefore, "city slickers" would be using more gas and wasting more
>>> energy.  Then, no one ever accused Jack of making sense.
>>
>>   Transit systems don't save fuel so your comments, as usual, are mean 
>> just
>> for the sake of being mean.
> 
> Yeah, you keep saying that, despite all evidence to the contrary.
> 
> If Jack, and you for that matter, would at least be polite, I'm sure you

> guys would get treated better.

I'd send them a Cadbury's a month by airmail.

-- 
Cor****ate society looks after everything.  All it asks of anyone, all it 
has ever asked of anyone, is that they do not interfere with management 
decisions.  -From “Rollerball”