Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Autos General > Re: High popula...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 22 of 40 Topic 5015 of 5196
Post > Topic >>

Re: High population density is good for bikes

by Pat <groups@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 6, 2008 at 10:22 AM

On Mar 6, 8:31=A0am, Bolwerk <bolw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Eric Vey wrote:
> > Martin Edwards wrote:
> >> Pat wrote:
> >>> On Mar 5, 11:30 am, Bolwerk <bolw...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Eric Vey wrote:
> >>>>> Miles Bader wrote:
> >>>>>> Pat <gro...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >>>>>>> Woohoo. =A0Where I live
> >>>>>> You don't count, Pat.
> >>>>>> -Miles
> >>>>> One would think that Pat and Jack would want the city slickers to
us=
e
> >>>>> less gas. That way the demand would go down and thus the price for
> >>>>> them.
> >>>>> =A0So I really don't understand their whole line of reasoning.
> >>>> Pat just seems to like to whine, but Jack apparently thinks transit
> >>>> systems should be shut down and everybody should be forced to
drive.
> >>>> Therefore, "city slickers" would be using more gas and wasting more
> >>>> energy. =A0Then, no one ever accused Jack of making sense.
>
> >>> It's not that I just want to whine, it is that I think that many of
> >>> the posts are extraordinarily ego-centric and arogant. =A0You want
to
> >>> live in some manner and think that everyone else should live in that
> >>> manner too. =A0There is a feeling of moral snugness and superiority
th=
at
> >>> is appalling. =A0But you think that your position somehow gives you
th=
e
> >>> ability/desire to regulate/legislate the actions of others -- ban
> >>> this, outlaw that, do away with that thing over there.
>
> >>> Go live your lives and enjoy them, but don't get snobbish and think
> >>> that just because you want to ride a bike and live in a high density
> >>> environment and eat bean sprouts and sing coombyya that everyone
else
> >>> wants to.
>
> >>> Go sell your car. =A0Go buy a parking ramp and tear it down so you
can=

> >>> build an empire on organic gardening. =A0Fool yourself into thinking
> >>> electricity is clean. =A0Go ahead and do it. =A0Just stop the
foolishn=
ess
> >>> of thinking that what you like is what everyone likes.
>
> >> I do not have a bike, and, living among Jamaicans, I pronounce "Com
by
> >> eya" properly. =A0I am not a vegetarian or a teetotaller, though I
must=

> >> confess to a lack of interest in s****t. =A0I do not want cars
abolished=
,
> >> even in cities. =A0I do not propose a light rail line for Ellsworth,
> >> Kansas. =A0I am a public trans****t sup****ter.
>
> > Now you've done it. You are not allowed to challenge the stereotypes.
If=

> > you do, they will just call you a loon and pretend you didn't say
> > anything of im****tance. These guys know it all and they certainly have
> > their stereotypes down.
>
> Heh.
>
> Last time I saw Pat troll here (misc.trans****t.urban-tranist), he was on
> about how city folk aren't "real people."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I'm reading this through alt.planning.urban    If you don't want my
responses, simply don't cross-post to here.
 




 40 Posts in Topic:
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-02-27 21:49:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-27 12:15:08 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Jack May" <  2008-02-27 16:22:47 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-02-27 21:56:52 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 01:09:54 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-02-28 08:35:54 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-02-28 14:10:29 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Jack May" <  2008-03-01 20:19:42 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-02 15:19:48 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
"Amy Blankenship&quo  2008-03-02 10:22:41 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-03 14:40:42 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Nobody <jock@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-07 01:48:00 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-05 16:46:18 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 20:19:42 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-05 21:23:26 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 23:28:26 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:16:48 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-06 08:29:35 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:15:31 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-06 03:46:05 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-06 08:31:16 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-06 10:22:40 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-06 10:25:40 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-06 14:03:42 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Pat <groups@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-06 12:37:46 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-08 01:34:36 
Re: Cell phone driving = drunk driving
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-03 10:19:05 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Miles Bader <miles.bad  2008-03-05 12:15:00 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Eric Vey <junker@[EMAI  2008-03-05 02:06:31 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 11:30:52 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
"George Conklin"  2008-03-05 16:11:04 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
James Robinson <wascan  2008-03-05 22:10:15 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
"George Conklin"  2008-03-05 19:15:22 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
James Robinson <wascan  2008-03-06 00:24:22 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:08:18 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-05 20:22:16 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:09:22 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Martin Edwards <big_ma  2008-03-06 08:07:01 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Bolwerk <bolwerk@[EMAI  2008-03-09 15:06:31 
Re: High population density is good for bikes
Miles Bader <miles@[EM  2008-03-06 10:05:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 8:34:48 CST 2008.