Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > Landrover > Re: ZF 4-speed,...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 14 Topic 9823 of 10286
Post > Topic >>

Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes

by Austin Shackles <austinDITCHTHISFORBETTERRESULTS@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 29, 2008 at 11:07 PM

On or around Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:17:48 +1200, EMB <embtwo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
enlightened us thusly:

>Austin Shackles wrote:
>> Lower geared is not altogether a bad thing either.  Past experience is
that
>> TC stall is about 1800 on the ZF 4HP22 ex-rangie, and that, with the
rangie
>> gearing in a 110, made for a lot of use of kickdown, at least with the
gas
>> setup I had on it before.  However, the 110 I've got me eye on (bank
>> permitting) has a sod-off Holley carb on it, so might make more torque.
 
>
>The intake manifold is likely to make more difference to torque than the 
>carb will.  And offroad you'll find that unless said Holley has centre 
>hung floats it'll probably flood like a bastard when on side slopes.  If 
>however you gasify it the Holley is likely to work quite well.

's a bit academic, anyway, bloke wants too much moolah for the motor.

Plan B now, I know for a '91 SW with no engine and box, and mine has an
engine and box, and if I'd have got the one I referred to, I'd have had to
do a gearbox swap anyway.

Still be nice to have the 110 T-box ratios, the BW one is really too high
geared for the 3.5 and in for the motor, especially if it gets 33x10.5
tyres
on it.
-- 
Austin Shackles.  www.ddol-las.net  my opinions are just that
Travel The Galaxy!  Meet Fascinating Life Forms...
------------------------------------------------\   
   >>  http://www.schlockmercenary.com/
 <<      \  ...and Kill them.
a webcartoon by Howard Tayler; I like it, maybe you will too!
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
Austin Shackles <austi  2008-06-24 18:29:28 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
Pete M <pete.murray@[E  2008-06-24 19:20:17 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
"Oily" <mart  2008-06-24 21:38:52 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
.mother <nospam@[EMAIL  2008-06-24 21:48:31 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
Austin Shackles <austi  2008-06-27 10:29:28 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
EMB <embtwo@[EMAIL PRO  2008-06-27 23:17:48 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
Austin Shackles <austi  2008-06-29 23:07:39 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
"Oily" <mart  2008-06-27 20:42:09 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
andrew <news@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-27 20:39:25 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
"Oily" <mart  2008-06-27 21:04:16 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
andrew <news@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-27 21:17:21 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
"Oily" <mart  2008-06-28 01:13:47 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
Austin Shackles <austi  2008-06-29 23:11:46 
Re: ZF 4-speed, T-boxes
"Oily" <mart  2008-06-29 23:55:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 16:32:44 PST 2009.