Talk About Network

Google





Car and Auto Forums > Big Block Ford Mercury > Re: Why I would...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 481 of 587
Post > Topic >>

Re: Why I would rather have a 427 Sideoiler was You Guys

by CobraJet <shedding@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 8, 2007 at 04:02 PM

In article <4618f8a3$0$501$815e3792@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Big Al
<sal1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> "TS#15" <notarealemailaddress@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:gL3Sh.392$fy6.1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Big Al wrote:
> > > "TS#15" <laptop@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:fWRRh.346$fy6.213@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >> Big Al wrote:
> > >>> The answer is put a 460 in it:)
> > >>>
> > >>> Al # 35
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> I prefer the old school 427 Sideoiler :)
> > >
> > > Explain why, please.
> > >
> > > Al # 35
> > >
> > >
> > Personal preference as a 460 is so "plain jane" these days. You see
them
> > in everything, Mustangs, Pinto's, even saw one being shoehorned into a
> > festiva at a local race shop last month. Now, a 427 Sideoiler, then
only
> > thing I see those in these days are big ass Galaxies, mid 60's LTD's
and
> > such.
> >
> >
> > TS#15
> 
> I thought you were going to say: If I had a 460 that made 550 HP and you
had
> a 427 side oiler that made 550 HP. My engine would be worth $1,000 and
yours
> would bring $50,000:)
> 
> Al # 35
> 
> 

   Yeah, that sounds about right...!

-- 
CobraJet
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Why I would rather have a 427 Sideoiler was You Guys
"Big Al" <sa  2007-04-08 07:23:54 
Re: Why I would rather have a 427 Sideoiler was You Guys
CobraJet <shedding@[EM  2007-04-08 16:02:20 
Re: Why I would rather have a 427 Sideoiler was You Guys
TS#15 <laptop@[EMAIL P  2007-04-08 21:04:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 23:28:43 PST 2009.