CobraJet wrote:
> In article <4638cf1e$0$3575$ae4e5890@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Laurie S.
> <aztlan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "JF" <JFhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:o0SZh.216417$ZA5.109750@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> I went today and registerd my 67 Mustang after being in work since
2003 and
>>> had no problems. Showed them the Hagerty insurance and got my tags
for 2
>>> years with no emission check. Hard to believe the Tucson MVD even
knew
>>> about it.
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>> Laurie S. wrote:
>>>> From the EPA website:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Collectible cars removed from Phoenix, Tucson smog program
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SAN FRANCISCO - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today
announced
>>>> that Tucson motorcycles and Phoenix and Tucson collectible vehicles
will
>>>> no longer have to undergo emissions tests beginning April 30. The
change
>>>> to the state's clean air plan affects approximately 3,800 collectible
>>>> vehicles in Maricopa County and about 1,400 collectible vehicles and
>>>> 6,240 motorcycles in Pima County. The Arizona Department of
Environmental
>>>> Quality studied the effect of exempting motorcycles, collectible
>>>> vehicles, and vehicles 25 model years old and older from the current
>>>> emission testing program and showed that exempting motorcycles and
>>>> collectible vehicles from the Tucson area program and collectible
>>>> vehicles from the Phoenix area program would not interfere with
meeting
>>>> and maintaining health-based standards for ozone and carbon monoxide.
In
>>>> the event that the ozone or carbon monoxide air quality standards are
>>>> violated in these areas, the state's plan can reinstate the
requirements.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> I just did mine today as a 39th birthday present for Trouble. The car
>> hasn't been unregistered since 1991, so it took a little longer to get
it
>> back in the system. I even ordered my personalized plates a few
minutes
>> ago, 68MYWAY. :)
>>
>> -----------
>> Laurie S.
>> Thunder S**** #7
>>
>>
>
> Sounds kool. I was thinking something controversial for myself.
> Perhaps "NAPPYHO" ?
>
How about BTCHSLP. I can't believe you guys get 7 letters and we get 6.
--
Jason
|
