Re: Converter Suggestion - Big Al!!

In article <46BC6E5B.E1D04447@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Stan Weiss
<srweiss@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> CobraJet wrote:
> > 
> > In article <100820070040205173%shedding@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, CobraJet
> > <shedding@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >    Thanks for the links. I'd say that sucks the big, er, small, one.
I
> > > do have an old 4779 750. What about changing out the main body to
one
> > > of the new Proform or Holley?
> > >
> > >    What about the adjustable-size King Demon?
> > 
> >    Looking at a long list of other improvements in the HP line, I
> > wonder if it's wise to dismiss the 950 so quickly. It's still going to
> > outflow my 750, and have all the new goodies besides. Going to a
> > Dominator is not an option.
> > 
> > --
> > CobraJet
> 
> They in the past used inches of Mercury. Now it looks like they have
> gone to 28 inches of water which is what most cylinder head flow numbers
> are done at. What this does is a carb rated at 2.06 inches has 1.172
> times the flow as the same carb rated at 1.5 inches.

   I mentioned a while back that I picked up a pick up that had two 350
cfm Holley 2V's on a factory dual quad FE intake. Got me to wondering
if having such a manifold on a bracket car with a pair of 500 cfm 2V's
wouldn't be a trick deal. No secondaries to dial in, and better flow
distribution than a centrally mounted single quad.

   Hmm?

-- 
CobraJet