Re: Converter Suggestion - Big Al!!

CobraJet wrote:
> 
> In article <46BC6E5B.E1D04447@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Stan Weiss
> <srweiss@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > CobraJet wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <100820070040205173%shedding@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, CobraJet
> > > <shedding@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >    Thanks for the links. I'd say that sucks the big, er, small,
one. I
> > > > do have an old 4779 750. What about changing out the main body to
one
> > > > of the new Proform or Holley?
> > > >
> > > >    What about the adjustable-size King Demon?
> > >
> > >    Looking at a long list of other improvements in the HP line, I
> > > wonder if it's wise to dismiss the 950 so quickly. It's still going
to
> > > outflow my 750, and have all the new goodies besides. Going to a
> > > Dominator is not an option.
> > >
> > > --
> > > CobraJet
> >
> > They in the past used inches of Mercury. Now it looks like they have
> > gone to 28 inches of water which is what most cylinder head flow
numbers
> > are done at. What this does is a carb rated at 2.06 inches has 1.172
> > times the flow as the same carb rated at 1.5 inches.
> 
>    I mentioned a while back that I picked up a pick up that had two 350
> cfm Holley 2V's on a factory dual quad FE intake. Got me to wondering
> if having such a manifold on a bracket car with a pair of 500 cfm 2V's
> wouldn't be a trick deal. No secondaries to dial in, and better flow
> distribution than a centrally mounted single quad.
> 
>    Hmm?
> 
> --
> CobraJet

The 2 350 cfm 2v flow the same as a 495 cfm 4v.
The 2 500 cfm 2v flow the same as a 707 cfm 4v.
If the 4v are rated at 1.5