Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Mopars > Re: !978 Challe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 27 Topic 898 of 969
Post > Topic >>

Re: !978 Challenger

by "Larry" <larry_a_crites@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 8, 2007 at 12:50 PM

Know him. Dennis the Menace.

Larry

"rob" <me @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:46e08516$0$16451$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 yeah but a hemi in a Plymouth arrow....and watch out!
:
:
: "Steve" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
: news:1uGdnYN8GPscp33bnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Bryan wrote:
: >
: >> "Newsgroups" wrote:
: >>
: >>>A frat brother of mine had one.  It was gold and was very quick and 
fast.
: >>>Good handling.  Back then, it seemed like every other person in
: >>>Cincinnati
: >>>had one of these.
: >>
: >>
: >> In '78-'83, the second-generation Challenger (a Mitsu im****t) was 
powered
: >> by
: >> a carbureted inline 4cyl 1.6L (4G32) or 2.6L (4G54)... about 100hp
for
: >> the
: >> 'big' engine.  Unless your frat brother seriously hotrodded it or 
swapped
: >> in
: >> a larger engine, you must be thinking of the first generation 70-74
: >> Challenger.
: >
: > Not to mention the fact that the Mitsu engines wouldn't run even at
100
: > horses for long before breaking a cylinder head.... those things were
: > JUNK!
: >
:
: 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
!978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 16:00:32 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-03 13:09:12 
Re: !978 Challenger
"John Kunkel" &  2007-09-03 12:05:42 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-03 16:03:59 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-03 21:23:02 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-03 15:20:03 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Newsgroups" &l  2007-09-05 23:00:45 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-05 23:49:36 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-06 12:36:01 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-06 18:51:34 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-06 19:05:35 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steveo <moparholic@[EM  2007-09-07 02:53:30 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-08 12:50:52 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-08 21:37:36 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-08 20:34:40 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-09 08:54:50 
Re: !978 Challenger
"43fan" <sle  2007-09-14 07:48:26 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Newsgroups" &l  2007-09-08 15:59:20 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-09 01:06:13 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-09 06:21:08 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-10 13:22:28 
Re: !978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 17:15:56 
Re: !978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 17:17:54 
Re: !978 Challenger
"43fan" <sle  2007-09-04 12:09:56 
Re: !978 Challenger
Rich Jordan <jordan@[E  2007-09-10 10:30:42 
Re: !978 Challenger
"H_wingman@[EMAIL PR  2007-09-12 05:07:52 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-12 21:46:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Nov 23 5:33:04 CST 2008.