Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Mopars > Re: !978 Challe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 27 Topic 898 of 957
Post > Topic >>

Re: !978 Challenger

by "rob" <me @[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 8, 2007 at 09:37 PM

good friend of mine......haven't talked to him thought in a year and a half

though. he's in Colorado and I'm not.


he owns a roadrunner, superbird, hemi cuda and dart as well.



"Larry" <larry_a_crites@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:46e2e307$0$28879$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Know him. Dennis the Menace.
>
> Larry
>
> "rob" <me @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:46e08516$0$16451$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : yeah but a hemi in a Plymouth arrow....and watch out!
> :
> :
> : "Steve" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> : news:1uGdnYN8GPscp33bnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : > Bryan wrote:
> : >
> : >> "Newsgroups" wrote:
> : >>
> : >>>A frat brother of mine had one.  It was gold and was very quick and
> fast.
> : >>>Good handling.  Back then, it seemed like every other person in
> : >>>Cincinnati
> : >>>had one of these.
> : >>
> : >>
> : >> In '78-'83, the second-generation Challenger (a Mitsu im****t) was
> powered
> : >> by
> : >> a carbureted inline 4cyl 1.6L (4G32) or 2.6L (4G54)... about 100hp 
> for
> : >> the
> : >> 'big' engine.  Unless your frat brother seriously hotrodded it or
> swapped
> : >> in
> : >> a larger engine, you must be thinking of the first generation 70-74
> : >> Challenger.
> : >
> : > Not to mention the fact that the Mitsu engines wouldn't run even at 
> 100
> : > horses for long before breaking a cylinder head.... those things
were
> : > JUNK!
> : >
> :
> :
>
>
>
> -- 
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
!978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 16:00:32 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-03 13:09:12 
Re: !978 Challenger
"John Kunkel" &  2007-09-03 12:05:42 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-03 16:03:59 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-03 21:23:02 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-03 15:20:03 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Newsgroups" &l  2007-09-05 23:00:45 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-05 23:49:36 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-06 12:36:01 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-06 18:51:34 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-06 19:05:35 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steveo <moparholic@[EM  2007-09-07 02:53:30 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-08 12:50:52 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-08 21:37:36 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-08 20:34:40 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-09 08:54:50 
Re: !978 Challenger
"43fan" <sle  2007-09-14 07:48:26 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Newsgroups" &l  2007-09-08 15:59:20 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-09 01:06:13 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-09 06:21:08 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-10 13:22:28 
Re: !978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 17:15:56 
Re: !978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 17:17:54 
Re: !978 Challenger
"43fan" <sle  2007-09-04 12:09:56 
Re: !978 Challenger
Rich Jordan <jordan@[E  2007-09-10 10:30:42 
Re: !978 Challenger
"H_wingman@[EMAIL PR  2007-09-12 05:07:52 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-12 21:46:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 20:50:26 CDT 2008.