Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Mopars > Re: !978 Challe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 27 Topic 898 of 962
Post > Topic >>

Re: !978 Challenger

by "Bryan" <bryan.swadenerNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 9, 2007 at 01:06 AM

Mitsu employed a "silent shaft" in their I4 engines of the time.  I found
85mph was top speed in a '76 Arrow 1.6L.

Around that time, when Glidden was running the W2 LA engine in an Arrow, a
local Hemi Superstock racer by the name of Dave Wren tried to make the
2.0L
engine run in D/Modified Compact.  I heard he'd run 12.8s in Pomona.  I
saw
the car here in Seattle but didn't get to see it make a pass.  Apparently,
after his burnout, he sheared off all 6 crankshaft-flywheel bolts.  Later,
I
learned he doesn't like to recall his experience with that car.  He had it
in an Arrow... side-draft Webers... Doug Nash 5-speed... Dana 60.

Bryan

Newsgroups wrote:
> It was a pretty small car, and for a 4 cylinder of the time, very smooth
> running.  He went 85 mph everywhere he could.  I'm not saying it was as
fast
> or quick as a 1st gen Challenger, but, for a 4 banger it was a quick
little
> mf.  Remember. Pinto. Vega. Chevette.
>
> Bryan wrote:
> > "Newsgroups" wrote:
> >> A frat brother of mine had one.  It was gold and was very quick and
fast.
> >> Good handling.  Back then, it seemed like every other person in
> >> Cincinnati
> >> had one of these.
> >
> > In '78-'83, the second-generation Challenger (a Mitsu im****t) was
powered
> > by
> > a carbureted inline 4cyl 1.6L (4G32) or 2.6L (4G54)... about 100hp for
the
> > 'big' engine.  Unless your frat brother seriously hotrodded it or
swapped
> > in
> > a larger engine, you must be thinking of the first generation 70-74
> > Challenger.  See Wikipedia: http://tinyurl.com/24ptjv
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> >
>
>
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
!978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 16:00:32 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-03 13:09:12 
Re: !978 Challenger
"John Kunkel" &  2007-09-03 12:05:42 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-03 16:03:59 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-03 21:23:02 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-03 15:20:03 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Newsgroups" &l  2007-09-05 23:00:45 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-05 23:49:36 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-06 12:36:01 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-06 18:51:34 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-06 19:05:35 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steveo <moparholic@[EM  2007-09-07 02:53:30 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-08 12:50:52 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-08 21:37:36 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Larry" <lar  2007-09-08 20:34:40 
Re: !978 Challenger
"rob" <me @[  2007-09-09 08:54:50 
Re: !978 Challenger
"43fan" <sle  2007-09-14 07:48:26 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Newsgroups" &l  2007-09-08 15:59:20 
Re: !978 Challenger
"Bryan" <bry  2007-09-09 01:06:13 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-09 06:21:08 
Re: !978 Challenger
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-09-10 13:22:28 
Re: !978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 17:15:56 
Re: !978 Challenger
ford <rauma@[EMAIL PRO  2007-09-03 17:17:54 
Re: !978 Challenger
"43fan" <sle  2007-09-04 12:09:56 
Re: !978 Challenger
Rich Jordan <jordan@[E  2007-09-10 10:30:42 
Re: !978 Challenger
"H_wingman@[EMAIL PR  2007-09-12 05:07:52 
Re: !978 Challenger
Brian <standingwater@[  2007-09-12 21:46:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 18:41:31 CDT 2008.