On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:39:55 -0700, isquat wrote:
> On Mar 23, 3:43 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:57:35 -0800, isquat wrote:
>> > On Mar 6, 5:16 am, "Robert" <kraft....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> What were the three Japanese cars and what was the American car? Are
>> >> the Japs even Hondas? Or are we comparing 80s Civics to an '07
>> >> Cadillac or Lincoln?
>>
>> > 02 Legacy with 92k miles to 03 Taurus with 95k miles. The former
>> > expired the engine at 166k
>>
>> There's a maintenance schedule in the book. You were supposed to change
>> the timing belt at 120K.
>>
> My nightmare of a car had nothing to do with the timing belt. Did I
> mention timing belt anywhere? You think with $10k dumped into the car I
> would've tried to save pennies on the timing belt?
Well, most people who kill their Hondas do so by not changing the timing
belt when called for. I figured you probably ignored the belt and ruined
the engine.
But I now see you came up with a more ingenious way to kill what should
have been a bullet-proof car...
|
