No yer not, now shut it.
Nick
"doc" <tek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Bi%Zc.64218$S55.39043@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I don't think you need to be involved in an area to have an opinion on
it.
> To that end; I'm not a hot rod builder, but I am certainly entitled to
have
> an opinion on hot rods in general.
>
> Along those lines, I'm not an asshole, but it's my considered opinion
that
> you are. I certainly don't need to be one to KNOW that you are.
>
> How appropriate that your username is defined by Websters as : "A very
> aggressive type of skin cancer that can spread to other areas of the
body
if
> not detected and treated early"
>
> That's just how I'd describe you.
>
>
>
>
> "Melanoma" <intrexATsasktelDOTnet> wrote in message
> news:10jgvm1c435qqbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > You know the maxim, "Everyone is entitled to an opinion"? Not only is
it
> a
> > ridiculous idea, it is fallacious, particularly when we are looking
for
> > VALID opinions. If it were, "Everyone is entitled to an opinion,
valid
or
> > not", then at least it would be an accurate statement. What
constitutes
> > validity? Evidence, a rationale, an apologetic, anything that can
> validate
> > one's opinion.
> >
> > I have an opinion of your mental capacity, and admittedly it is based
on
> > your ONE post. Did I jump to conclusions too hastily? Probably, but
so
> far
> > my *****sment still stands, because your one post still stands as the
only
> > evidence for my opinion. Until you provide us evidence of YOUR
fabulous
> > homebuilt vehicles, your opinion is invalid.
> >
> > BTW, I automatically classify anyone that has an opinion without
evidence
> to
> > back it up as an idiot. I leave the burden to you to prove otherwise.
> >
> >
> >
> > "doc" <tek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:ZGZZc.64214$S55.16490@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I'm an idiot ?
> > >
> > > You don't know me, you've never met me, and you have NO IDEA of my
IQ
or
> > > aptitudes.
> > >
> > > Pretty ballsy statement. I COULD be WAY smarter than you.
> > >
> > > ::
> > > :: doc
> > > ::
> > > :: tek @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fastmail.fm
> > > :: (remove spaces)
> > > ::
> > >
> > > "Melanoma" <intrexATsasktelDOTnet> wrote in message
> > > news:10jfd0sm4p0fu97@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Doc's an idiot, I am impressed with your effort. Got another
question
> > for
> > > > you, how hard was it to plate? I guess what I mean is, did you
have
> to
> > > pass
> > > > full inspection requirements?
> > > >
> > > > I didn't see any wind****eld wipers......
> > > >
> > > > I bought the book a few years ago with the intention of building
one.
> > > > Hasn't happened yet.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "M & M" <com@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > news:10jelgbekn3ane1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sorry for the inclompete post, I just wanna to get it out there.
> > > > >
> > > > > I did read the book from ron champion, and it looks like the car
> > > decribed
> > > > in
> > > > > his book. But that's where the comparison ends.
> > > > >
> > > > > The frame is 12" longer, 6" wider and taller.
> > > > >
> > > > > The front suspension is my own design
> > > > >
> > > > > The body is all steel inluding the fenders and flip up hood.
> > > > >
> > > > > Drivetrain:
> > > > >
> > > > > GM 305, turbo 350 tranny, 7.5" gm rearend
> > > > >
> > > > > The 3" sidepipes have build in mufflers.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1900 lbs with all the fluids
> > > > >
> > > > > It is registerd as a 1968 Lotus Car
> > > > >
> > > > > I will either sell it like this for somebody to finish to their
> liking
> > > or
> > > > I
> > > > > will complete it myself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or I can custom build one with any powertrain.
> > > > >
> > > > > mathijsNOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Check it out at: http://coolrods.sasktelwebsite.net/new.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
