Jeßus wrote:
>
>
> Well ya lost me with those replies.
> Apparently my agreement regarding certain races low tolerance of alcohol
> (and other genetic differences) equates to some kind of implied defense
> of criminal activity... fair enough, makes sense (!).
not at all, I'm merely focusing on my own point of contention - that
being that even if the medical reasons are there, I'm still a believer
(a minority if there ever was one) in personal responsibility. I didn't
think you were suggesting it was an excuse or explanation or anything,
it's just that some of the apologists would otherwise misquote, so I
made extra sure.
I understand depression, illness all that - often too personally, but
anyone who isn't a **** at heart doesn't take it out on others.
--
John McKenzie
tosspam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vice.president@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
president@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
world's #1 sardine whisperer root@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$USER@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$LOGNAME@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-h1024@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fraudinfo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
