Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Feck that s...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 45 of 62 Topic 21492 of 24868
Post > Topic >>

Re: Feck that stinks ...

by "Noddy" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 19, 2008 at 10:03 AM

"Kev" <kevcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47b99cd7$0$13959$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> how any first time home buyer is allowed to borrow $300000 for a house 
> with 30% of their income on repayments at the rate 2 years ago is
criminal 
> and banks who approved such loans should be held partially responsible 
> when they **** hits the fan

I disagree.

Not that I'm a fan of the banks and their money grabbing methods in any
way, 
but the responsibilty for such things rests entirely with the borrower. As

you said, those soon to be facing morgagee auctions will be doing so
because 
of their own stupidity, and I fail to see how that can be the problem of
the 
lender in any way.

The terms and conditions are clearly spelled out in any loan agreement,
and 
you have the op****tunity to read them (or have them explained to you by 
someone who can understand them if you can't) *before* you agree to them
and 
commit yourself by signing the agreement. If you're stupid enough to enter

into an agreement on the fringe of what you can afford when interest rates

are at an all time low then you deserve to suffer the consequences for
being 
an idiot in my opinion.

In a similar fa****on, people who complain about being ripped off with car 
purchases make me laugh.

You often see stories on ACA or TT about people who have bought cars and 
they've turned out to be lemons, and when they ***** they usually mention 
that they "paid this when the car was only worth that". The funny part to
me 
is that they *knew* what they were paying when they made the purchase, and

if the car wasn't worth what they were handing over then that's *their* 
****ing fault for not doing their homework.

> what I think is very rude is the Flats up the road, on the beachfront 
> which in 1975 was a place of absolute squalor with the cheapest rent in 
> town, now has, with **** all improvement, one of the highest rents for a

> unit in town.

Try living in my area.

In 1980 my old man was doing some work for a builder in this area who
built 
6 2 bedroom ground floor flats over two house blocks and offered one to
the 
old man off the plan for 18 grand. One just sold a month ago for 628
grand.

--
Regards,
Noddy.
 




 62 Posts in Topic:
Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-13 00:12:18 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Diesel Damo <Diesel_4W  2008-02-13 00:43:57 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-13 19:32:20 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"John Hudson" &  2008-02-13 11:05:02 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-14 07:40:17 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-02-14 03:21:35 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 19:44:11 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-14 20:18:03 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 23:54:10 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-15 06:16:27 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-15 07:54:28 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-15 15:06:56 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-15 19:25:16 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-15 22:32:12 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-16 09:53:31 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-16 14:25:03 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-02-16 05:55:57 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-13 20:34:44 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
monsya <dale-google@[E  2008-02-13 03:42:22 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-02-13 13:01:35 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 11:00:12 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Klompmeester"   2008-02-14 02:47:07 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Lu R" <who   2008-02-14 12:15:10 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-13 16:51:25 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 14:06:35 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-13 17:29:07 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 14:01:13 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-02-14 03:27:46 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-13 19:27:49 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Andy <no@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-02-14 19:52:23 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-15 22:44:53 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-02-14 06:01:09 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-14 17:34:20 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 20:10:59 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-14 19:44:59 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-14 00:41:24 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-14 17:57:19 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-15 19:24:42 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Klompmeester"   2008-02-16 05:40:43 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-17 15:13:34 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-17 15:44:41 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-18 01:27:06 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-18 22:20:32 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 00:57:22 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-19 10:03:08 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-19 16:52:26 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-02-15 05:00:11 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-15 01:16:48 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-15 01:25:11 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-15 22:06:43 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-15 01:57:55 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Scotty" <sc  2008-02-16 07:48:58 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-02-16 08:16:21 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-16 14:29:12 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-15 03:15:58 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
"Noddy" <me@  2008-02-16 01:21:27 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-02-15 11:47:00 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-02-15 11:47:32 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-15 22:22:04 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-18 16:23:31 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-02-19 04:34:09 
Re: Feck that stinks ...
Albm&ctd <alb_mand  2008-02-20 20:17:16 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 7:24:08 CST 2008.