janpajak@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mar 1, 10:58 pm, "zzbun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <zzbun...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> ...
>
>>>"In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"
>>>`Homer J. Simpson
>
> ...
>
> Well, firstly you would need to prove that there are such things as
> the "laws of thermodynamics". For my best knowledge, whatever you call
> by this name, are actually just statistical predictions which
> sometimes do work, sometimes refuse to work. A perfect example when
> these statistic predictions are disobeyed, are so-called "heat pumps"
> which have over 100% efficiency. Also, as I explained this before, our
> planet Earth as a whole disobeys these "laws" too.
You obviously are ignoring the Law of Conservation or Energy. In short
that states that energy can not be created or destroyed, it can only be
changed from one form to another.
>
> Thus, since there are already numerous cases identified, when these
> supposed "laws" do NOT work, all evidence indicates that the flywheel
> perpetually propelled by the Coriolis effect, will be a next such a
> case. So let us encourage someone to build one, and to prove that it
> actually DOES work in practice against these supposed "laws".
>
> With the totaliztic salute,
> Jan Pajak
>
By the way, your perpetual motion fly wheel would not work if for no
other reason than due to both air resistance and friction in the
mechanism.
Now stop trying to BS the people on sci.energy who have backgrounds in
the sciences or engineering. It only makes you like an even bigger fool
that we thought you were when you made your first post.
My Simpson's quote aside, I think that Kurt Vonnegut said it best when
he described perpetual motions machines as "The Complicated Futility of
Ignorance."
ALV
|
