"Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:f5050aed-fded-4e32-9e3f-2b1773338ef9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Feb 27, 10:38 pm, janpa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| > Our scientists are so succesful in telling us that perpetual motion
| > generators cannot be build, that we are scared to even try to build
| > one.
|
| They can't.
|
| However, the next best thing would be a machine that outlasts
| us, such as a solar-powered steam turbine. It would be
| indistinguishable from a pmm, since no one would live
| long enough to see it run down.
Why would one use steam when solar cells are readily
available?
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0605/iss2_sts114_big.jpg
But anyway, what's the big deal here?
You are saying (the equivalent of) a car engine will run forever
if you continue to supply fuel. It won't, it'll wear out. The PMM
has to run without energy input of any kind.
|
