Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Ping Jeremy...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 13 Topic 21761 of 24867
Post > Topic >>

Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol

by Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 8, 2008 at 06:59 AM

Diesel Damo <Diesel_4WD@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> I got this suspect email yesterday. Just wondering if there's any
> truth to it as I can't find anything on their website. Sounds like BS
> to me.

It's BS.  I've seen several variants to the theme.

>>   At the present the speed limit is 100K.P.H. with a tolerance of 102
>>   maximum. Over that and you are issued with a fine automatically.

This is wrong for starters.  The numbers that I've come across from not
only Shane and Spooky but also an official RTA representative who was
asked
what the tolerance was by a local radio station indicate that the minimum
bookable speed in NSW is at least limit+10%+1km/h.  IIRC, the RTA official
stated the fixed cameras in NSW worked to limit+10%+4km/h as the starting
point for infringements.

>>   Speed Camera fine is almost impossible. You must prove the device is
>>   faulty and if you are not a technician working on them, you have no
>>   chance of beating the fine.

However, it is possible to fight a large number of identical infringements
over a short period and have it reduced to a single infringement of the
highest of the set.

>>   The Pacific Highway has a set and these are recognized by large steel
>>   frames over the lanes with a speed camera and some distance up the
>>   road is another large metal frame with a speed camera.

Not familiar with where these are on the Pacific Hwy.

>>   These new point to point systems are being put onto any expressway
>>   and highway where vehicles are not able to exit between those points.

The ones on the F3 were explained here by Jeremy some time ago.

First camera takes a photo of the limit showing on the first overhead
gantry when a vehicle is being photographed on the standard single camera
at the 2nd gantry.

IIRC, it's the faulty camera from the Spit Road debacle relocated...

>>   NOTE: School zone cameras are not speed tolerant. Anything over, even
>>   41, is a fine.

Complete and utter crap.  Absolute minimum for infringement is still
limit+10%+1km/h = 45km/h.

>>   Tammy Umasaran
>>   Cor****ate & Admin Sup****t
>>   Ministry of Trans****t

This is quite funny for anyone who knows what the MoT does...

They license public vehicles - taxis, hire cars and buses.  Nothing to do
with speed cameras!

>>   Phone: 02- 9891 8941
>>   Fax: 02- 9891 8999

I wonder whose numbers these are...

-- 
Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>
  Linux Registered User # 254000
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Ping Jeremy or Athol
Diesel Damo <Diesel_4W  2008-03-06 15:04:25 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-07 10:40:32 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
"Mot Adv" <m  2008-03-07 11:42:50 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-07 17:04:52 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
"Mot Adv" <m  2008-03-08 10:26:42 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-08 13:55:26 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
ReSiN8oR <imnot@[EMAIL  2008-03-08 17:15:34 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
"Mot Adv" <m  2008-03-08 19:32:42 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 21:55:15 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-08 22:47:16 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-03-07 17:12:19 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-03-08 06:59:00 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Feral Al <plonked@[EMA  2008-03-08 18:47:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 4:07:10 CST 2008.