Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Ping Jeremy...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 13 Topic 21761 of 24867
Post > Topic >>

Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol

by "Mot Adv" <mot.adv@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 8, 2008 at 07:32 PM

"
>> F6 Fog vid - unrelated.
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8FkLjK9KG4

"ReSiN8oR" WROTE: -
I was thinking the same thing. I've driven along in both directions day
and night in heavy fog. Times less than 20m visibility. Particularly
around Maddens Plains. At least at night you can see lighting making the
drive easier. I can still vaguely remember a massive pileup one foggy
day years ago. Many cars involved. Ring any one elses bell?

Longish text follows aus.cars:-

NSW Legislative Assembly discussion leading to regulations allowing for
the 
use of hazard-warning lights on moving vehicles under hazardous weather 
conditions causing reduced visibility. Adopted nationally, we now
recognised 
this as Australian Road Rule 221(e).  Please see commentary at the end of 
discussion, advocacy for a mandatory rear fog lamp rule for MA, MB and MC 
ADR categories, with a study for heavy vehicle implementation required.
220 ASSEMBLY 18 May, 1988

LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

Wednesday, 18 May, 1988

HAZARDOUS DRIVING CONDITIONS Page 52

Mr ZAMMIT (Strathfield) 15.521:

I bring to the notice of the Minister for Administrative Services and 
Assistant Minister for Trans****t the dangerous situation encountered on
the 
roads by drivers of motor vehicles when fog blankets our countryside. 
Honourable members have witnessed the beauty of fog as it tumbles among 
mountains and through valleys, but have experienced also the feeling of 
alarm that accompanies the sudden and unexpected loss of vision which 
blanketing fog presents. Fog can be threatening. We may not see
confidently 
what is ahead of us, and there may be a nagging fear that some other
driver, 
foolish, or impatient or inattentive, will not slow down to a sensible 
speed, and will overrun us, though we may be acting responsibly. These
fears 
are well founded. Serious collisions have occurred involving slow or 
frequently- stopping vehicles, such as school buses. Numerous pile-ups
have 
occurred on our freeways, especially when fog has been encountered
suddenly 
by vehicles travelling at high speed. Some of our steepest and windiest 
roads pass through areas that are subject to fog. In some cases the
hazards 
are compounded by slippery road surfaces.




In 1987 some seven fatal crashes involved investigating police re****ting
the 
presence of fog or mist as a direct contributing factor. A further 452 
accidents were directly attributed to poor visibility because of mist or 
fog. Those accidents led to injuries and to vehicles being towed from the 
scene. According to federal estimates these crashes cost the New South
Wales 
economy about $9 million a year. In my electorate, which includes the F4 
Freeway from Concord through Parramatta to Westmead, in 1987 there were 
three deaths, 11 people seriously wounded and 50 people injured in
accidents 
occasioned during periods of poor visibility, which may have involved fog
or 
mist.

272 ASSEMBLY 18 May, 1988 Page 53

On 19th January an article in the Daily Mirror referred to a spate of 
multicar pile-ups resulting from poor visibility and high speed on the F6 
Freeway. An accident on 17th January involving 12 cars resulted in nine 
people being injured. It was pointed out that though expressways such as
the 
F4 and the F6 are among the safest roads in New South Wales, they can be a

potential death trap under conditions of fog or mist. Reference was made
in 
that article to a system used by the Californian Highway Patrol, known as 
operation fogdown. It is said to involve police escorts for convoys of 
vehicles, with a police car travelling in front and another at the rear of

the convoy. I am troubled by the suggestion that the police in New South 
Wales were considering the introduction of that system, especially in
light 
of the present demands on police resources. I have been a member of the 
Staysafe committee for the past three years and I do not recall the issue
of 
fog conditions being considered by it.

We cannot stop fog, nor can we locate all roads in areas where fog is 
infrequent. We cannot rigidly control at1 drivers all the time, but we can

do more than has been done to encourage drivers to anticipate and to
respond 
sensibly to this hazard so as to improve the ease with which vehicles can
be 
seen in the fog. The Minister might wish to comment on this situation and 
inform the House what steps the Government will take to alleviate the 
horrendous road toll. Last night in the House I mentioned that the road
toll 
has risen 9 per cent over last year's figure. That rise has occurred in
the 
first five months of this year. Extended over a 12-month period it would 
represent an increase in the road toll of 20 per cent. Such an increase is

unacceptable. I should like to hear of steps the Minister might take to 
reduce the horrendous carnage on our roads.

Mr SINGLETON

Minister for Administrative Services and Assistant Minister for Trans****t

(Coffs Harbour) 15.571:

The honourable member for Strathfield has become well known in this House 
and throughout the State for his interest in road safety matters. He is 
interested also in other forms of trans****t and fought hard for a better 
train service to the Bunvood area. During the past four years he has
turned 
a former Labor seat into a blue-ribbon Liberal seat and is to be 
congratulated on the work he has done. He has become a man of the people
in 
his electorate. He is well known for his interest in trans****t issues, and

particularly road safety. He has represented consistently the interests of

his constituents in seeking improved road and rail services.

In the parliamentary sphere he has worked as chairman designate on the 
Staysafe committee and has made a significant contribution to improving
road 
safety in New South Wales. His reference to statistics indicates his depth

of knowledge on road safety. I welcome his constructive comments in
raising 
this issue of the hazard of driving in fog. Driving in thick fog is one of

the worst experiences suffered by a driver. It is a frequent cause of 
accidents in rural areas. In times of fog many roads become high risk
areas 
because of wet and slippery conditions and poor visibility.

Many country roads, such as the Great Western Highway through the Blue 
Mountains, the Bulli-Sublime Point area of the F6 Freeway, and the 
tablelands and the valleys of the State, are dangerous in foggy
conditions. 
This was shown to be the case in the recent multiple vehicle accident to 
which the honourable member referred. Many motorists fail to drive 
appropriately for the conditions prevailing and are unable to stop quickly

if an emergency arises. In these conditions drivers should be as
responsible 
as possible.

The previous Government ignored its responsibility to minimize the dangers

associated with driving in fog. Recently the Minister for Trans****t
approved 
changes in the regulations to the Motor Traffic Act to allow hazard -

273 18 May, 1988 ASSEMBLY Page 54

lights to be used during fog conditions. These regulations have been
amended 
on the recommendations of the Traffic Authority, the State Government
agency 
responsible for co-ordinating traffic management and road safety.
Previously 
motorists were prohibited from using hazard lights except where a vehicle 
was stopped in a hazardous position. Yellow or orange fla****ng lights are 
far more conspicuous than a steady beam from headlights or tail-lights.
Now, 
when driving in foggy conditions, motorists should turn on their hazard 
lights, put their headlights on low beam and drive slowly. This will make 
the vehicles more visible and will give other drivers sufficient time to 
react to any emergency situation. Driving with hazard lights displayed
under 
any other cir***stance will still, of course, be illegal.

MotAdv-Notes:

a) THE F6 suffered a multi-vehicle pileup exceeding 53 vehicles in fog
south 
of the then toll gates at the 'big dipper' at the time. NSW has had other 
multi-vehicle pileups in fog, heavy rain and the like, numerically in the
9, 
14 car range. Low visibility is a causing agent of end-result.

b) HAZARD warning lights at 12v/21watts are NOT as bright as low-beam 
headlights (12v/60watts), or front fog lights (12v/55watts).

c) HAZARD warning lights used in this fa****on are NOT intended to help you

see ahead as they are not low beam or front fog light in performance 
characteristics.

d) THE hazard warning lights allowance, as adopted by NSW back then, now 
nationally at ARR 221(e), was intended to act as defacto REAR FOG LAMPS.

e) THE NSW Authority of 1987/1988 would have been better advised to
advocate 
a change to what is now in 2008 - 'ADR 13, Part 8.5.1'. This stipulates; 
Presence: Paragraph 6.11.1 of Appendix A (Rear fog lamps, page 45 of
ADR13) 
does not apply. The fitment of rear fog lamps is optional in this rule.

f) THE use of hazard warning lights in the manner allowed by ARR
regulation 
221(e) bears conflict with the United Nations 1968 Convention on Road 
Traffic, Road Signs and Signals, Article 32, part 13.

END
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Ping Jeremy or Athol
Diesel Damo <Diesel_4W  2008-03-06 15:04:25 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-07 10:40:32 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
"Mot Adv" <m  2008-03-07 11:42:50 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-07 17:04:52 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
"Mot Adv" <m  2008-03-08 10:26:42 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-08 13:55:26 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
ReSiN8oR <imnot@[EMAIL  2008-03-08 17:15:34 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
"Mot Adv" <m  2008-03-08 19:32:42 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 21:55:15 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-08 22:47:16 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-03-07 17:12:19 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-03-08 06:59:00 
Re: Ping Jeremy or Athol
Feral Al <plonked@[EMA  2008-03-08 18:47:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 4:06:26 CST 2008.