Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Burnley Tun...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 44 of 68 Topic 21756 of 24867
Post > Topic >>

Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision

by Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 9, 2008 at 10:47 PM

Noddy wrote:
> "Kev" <kevcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:47d36978$0$12282$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> And yet it's perfectly fine for some retard who CAN manage to maintain 
>> 100kph but choses to plug along at 70 holding up everyone else for 20
klms 
>> but a truck holds up some cars for 100 metres and they should be hung
out 
>> to dry
> 
> Who said it was perfectly okay?
> 
> Slower vehicles should keep left, *regardless* of what they are. You
seem to 
> be suggesting that it's selfish for some car driving nut to sit in the
right 
> lane and hold everyone behind him up, but if a truck driver does it then

> it's perfectly okay because he's not holding people up for long.

so why is there no daily complaint about some ignorant holding up 
traffic for 20 klms on the highway but trucks do the same thing and it's 
"oh those pill popping drugged up truckies causing traffic chaos should 
be banished to a left lane only"

> Here's the scoop buddy: I've *never* seen a truck go through that tunnel
in 
> the right lane and only be in the right lane for 100 meters while
passing 
> other traffic. A couple of *kilometers* at the minmum, and then the
mouth 
> breathing mungbeans wonder why all the cars behind then give them the 
> finger.

so do all those car drivers who can, but don't, maintain the speed limit 
get the same, hardly, I bet there are far more cars doing it than trucks
too


>> get real
> 
> You could do with a stiff dose of that yourself I imagine.

I'm sure we all could

>> **** them then
>> bunch of whinging impatient wankers who might be 30 seconds late
getting 
>> home
> 
> The double standard is so thick here you could snick someone's head off
with 
> it :)

Indeed


>> Always the Truck that has to make allowances, heaven forbid a car
driver 
>> might make allowances for a truck
> 
> Hmm..
> 
> I can't remember the last time I saw a truck making allowances for a
car.

All day every day, in fact the Companies I work for insist that we make 
extra allowances and wear the **** slung at us by the retards that we 
manage NOT to kill by making allowances for their ****ed driving

> I've seen *plenty* of occurrences where cars have had to brake *heavily*
to 
> avoid hitting a semi

you've never see truck having to brake heavily for clowns who just "have 
to get past that truck", all too common, much more common than cars 
having to brake suddenly for trucks

  coming out of a driveway into a stream of steadily
> moving traffic with the obvious intention of making the cars give way to
him 
> because he's bigger.

So why do you thing they have to force their way out into traffic like 
that????
have a think about the last time you saw anyone give a truck a chance to 
get out of anywhere yet they will have no problem slowing a bit so a car 
can get out

getting to merge into any stream of traffic is usually a force your way 
in type scenario because no one will let the trucks in, yet they have no 
problem letting a few cars in

sit and watch at any merge point and observe the attitude change when a 
truck appears

> 
> The fact that a lot of truck drivers are ignorant impatient arseholes 
> probably has a lot to do with that.

not unlike most car drivers
what was that about double standards


Kev
 




 68 Posts in Topic:
Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-05 22:08:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-06 17:16:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"HeadRush" <  2008-03-06 18:32:44 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"The Raven" <  2008-03-06 22:15:38 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-06 20:04:48 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-06 00:19:38 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-06 08:45:27 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-06 21:02:44 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
jonz <fj40@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-07 14:06:19 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-07 16:04:49 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 22:18:31 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 00:21:12 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:40:31 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 21:08:27 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-06 20:59:33 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 22:35:09 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-08 22:56:42 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 00:33:43 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Blue Heeler" &  2008-03-08 18:41:29 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-08 22:52:05 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:45:05 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:46:12 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:43:39 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-06 02:22:16 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-06 02:25:43 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-06 12:59:33 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-06 15:33:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-07 17:01:35 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 22:30:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 00:24:14 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:37:11 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Andy <no@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-09 17:16:31 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 18:49:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 21:05:11 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-09 22:31:54 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Andy <no@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-09 22:45:56 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-09 22:42:30 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 00:06:03 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-12 20:10:32 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-12 22:11:35 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 23:08:06 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-13 19:24:22 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-12 14:02:10 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 22:47:56 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 13:07:17 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-10 16:48:57 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 18:32:14 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-10 17:59:37 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 19:38:49 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-10 22:42:10 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-11 09:07:54 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 20:57:48 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 20:55:16 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-08 18:17:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:39:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 18:49:54 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-08 21:08:12 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 16:38:59 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 13:19:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-12 22:03:26 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 23:05:25 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 21:28:08 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 15:58:55 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-12 17:18:11 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-12 22:04:21 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 23:06:08 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-12 00:38:36 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 22:13:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 1:53:11 CST 2008.