Re: YES, mechanical perpetual motion generator based on the Coriolis

The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> In sci.physics, Dan Bloomquist
> <public21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  wrote
> on Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:26:55 GMT
> <PkqAj.5745$7d1.92@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>> Androcles wrote:
>>> "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:18hAj.5718$7d1.2157@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> | And the underlying mechanism is understood to
>>> | be receding galaxies.
>>>
>>> Naive nonsense.
>> Once a crank, always a crank. How you doing cranky?
>>
>> You have quite the track record...
>>
>> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html
> 
> Yes he does, and I think Dirk gave up out of sheer frustration on
> cataloging all of them. ;-)
> 
>>>   http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
>> Retard. Does it hurt?
> 
> The only thing that appears to pain him is the fact that
> SR has been widely accepted in the world of physics...

> Regrettably, actual data validating SR is a little hard to
> come by, and some experiments are easily misinterpreted --
> he routinely touts Sagnac as disproving SR, for example.
> (Short answer: it doesn't, really.)

I know. I tried to explain the Sagnac effect to him about four years 
ago. At least, that if c' = c + v there would be no beat frequency. He 
is adamant about his beliefs.

Best, Dan.