Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Burnley Tun...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 45 of 68 Topic 21756 of 24867
Post > Topic >>

Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision

by "Noddy" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 10, 2008 at 01:07 PM

"Kev" <kevcat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47d3dc82$0$4471$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> so why is there no daily complaint about some ignorant holding up
traffic 
> for 20 klms on the highway but trucks do the same thing and it's "oh
those 
> pill popping drugged up truckies causing traffic chaos should be
banished 
> to a left lane only"

Cars that do it are just as much of a pain in the arse, but generally when

cars do it they move out of the way a hell of a lot quicker. I don't care 
what you drive, there's *nothing* more frustrating than trucks spread
across 
all lanes having a 7 kilometer long "drag race", with the fastest of them 
being walking pace quicker than the rest.

Incidentally, *all* slow vehicles should keep left. Not just trucks.

> so do all those car drivers who can, but don't, maintain the speed limit

> get the same, hardly, I bet there are far more cars doing it than trucks

> too

Of course you would, but then you're a truck driver, and truck drivers can

do no wrong in your eyes.

To me a bad driver is a bad driver. Regardless of what they're driving.

> All day every day, in fact the Companies I work for insist that we make 
> extra allowances and wear the **** slung at us by the retards that we 
> manage NOT to kill by making allowances for their ****ed driving

By doing what exactly?

> you've never see truck having to brake heavily for clowns who just "have

> to get past that truck", all too common, much more common than cars
having 
> to brake suddenly for trucks

How do you know?

> So why do you thing they have to force their way out into traffic like 
> that????

They have to ****ingwell *wait* like everyone else.

Jesus Christ, this is *exactly* the problem. They're too ****ing impatient

to get moving at a snail's pace so they have to push in and make everyone 
else around them give way to *them*.

> have a think about the last time you saw anyone give a truck a chance to

> get out of anywhere yet they will have no problem slowing a bit so a car

> can get out
>
> getting to merge into any stream of traffic is usually a force your way
in 
> type scenario because no one will let the trucks in, yet they have no 
> problem letting a few cars in
>
> sit and watch at any merge point and observe the attitude change when a 
> truck appears

Mate, you live in a fantasy world where truck drivers are heroes and 
everyone else is a **** :)

I can tell you right now as sure as I'm sitting here that if your average 
truck driver was the conscientious & accomodating driver you make them out

to be we wouldn't be having this discussion.

> not unlike most car drivers
> what was that about double standards

It certainly goes both ways, but clearly not in your view.

--
Regards,
Noddy.
 




 68 Posts in Topic:
Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-05 22:08:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-06 17:16:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"HeadRush" <  2008-03-06 18:32:44 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"The Raven" <  2008-03-06 22:15:38 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-06 20:04:48 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-06 00:19:38 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-06 08:45:27 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-06 21:02:44 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
jonz <fj40@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-07 14:06:19 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-07 16:04:49 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 22:18:31 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 00:21:12 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:40:31 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 21:08:27 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-06 20:59:33 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 22:35:09 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-08 22:56:42 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 00:33:43 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Blue Heeler" &  2008-03-08 18:41:29 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-08 22:52:05 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:45:05 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:46:12 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:43:39 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-06 02:22:16 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-06 02:25:43 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-06 12:59:33 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-06 15:33:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-07 17:01:35 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-08 22:30:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 00:24:14 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:37:11 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Andy <no@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-09 17:16:31 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 18:49:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 21:05:11 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-09 22:31:54 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Andy <no@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-03-09 22:45:56 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-09 22:42:30 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 00:06:03 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-12 20:10:32 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-12 22:11:35 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 23:08:06 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-13 19:24:22 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"George W Frost"  2008-03-12 14:02:10 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 22:47:56 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 13:07:17 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-10 16:48:57 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 18:32:14 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-10 17:59:37 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-10 19:38:49 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-10 22:42:10 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-11 09:07:54 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 20:57:48 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Je=DFus?=   2008-03-09 20:55:16 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-08 18:17:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-03-09 14:39:02 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-09 18:49:54 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
the fonz <arthur.fonzz  2008-03-08 21:08:12 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 16:38:59 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 13:19:18 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-12 22:03:26 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 23:05:25 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-11 21:28:08 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 15:58:55 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Toby Ponsenby <me@[EMA  2008-03-12 17:18:11 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-03-12 22:04:21 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 23:06:08 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
sgam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-12 00:38:36 
Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision
"Noddy" <me@  2008-03-12 22:13:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 1:34:41 CST 2008.