Re: YES, mechanical perpetual motion generator based on the Coriolis effect is going to work (JP)

"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message

news:cqoea5-m1k.ln1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| In sci.physics, Dan Bloomquist
| <public21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
| wrote
| on Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:34:25 GMT
| <lm%Aj.5821$7d1.4330@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
| > The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
| >> In sci.physics, Dan Bloomquist
| >> <public21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
| >>  wrote
| >> on Sat, 08 Mar 2008 06:26:55 GMT
| >> <PkqAj.5745$7d1.92@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
| >>> Androcles wrote:
| >>>> "Dan Bloomquist" <public21@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
| >>>> news:18hAj.5718$7d1.2157@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >>>>
| >>>> | And the underlying mechanism is understood to
| >>>> | be receding galaxies.
| >>>>
| >>>> Naive nonsense.
| >>> Once a crank, always a crank. How you doing cranky?
| >>>
| >>> You have quite the track record...
| >>>
| >>> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html
| >>
| >> Yes he does, and I think Dirk gave up out of sheer frustration on
| >> cataloging all of them. ;-)
| >>
| >>>> 
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg
| >>> Retard. Does it hurt?
| >>
| >> The only thing that appears to pain him is the fact that
| >> SR has been widely accepted in the world of physics...
| >
| >> Regrettably, actual data validating SR is a little hard to
| >> come by, and some experiments are easily misinterpreted --
| >> he routinely touts Sagnac as disproving SR, for example.
| >> (Short answer: it doesn't, really.)
| >
| > I know. I tried to explain the Sagnac effect to him about four years
| > ago. At least, that if c' = c + v there would be no beat frequency. He
| > is adamant about his beliefs.
|
| And has been since about 1999.
|
Sagnac disproves SR because there is a beat. At least if c was the
same is all frames of reference there would be no beat.
Bloomquist has his head up his arse and is adamant in his belief in
Einstein's ****. What he tries to explain he fails at miserably.
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/SagnacIdiocy.htm

the counter-rotating pulse arrives at the "end" point slightly earlier
than 
the co-rotating pulse at exactly the same time.

****ing idiot.