Re: Burnley Tunnel-vision

"Daryl Walford" <dwalford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:13tfe4gmicsgi04@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What utter rubbish, why should a truck capable of doing the speed limit
be 
> held up by some twonk in a car who drives well below the speed limit?

What, two lanes ain't enough?

> Getting stuck behind such an idiot is what causes the trucks to slow
down, 
> when a truck looses its momentum its unable to maintain a decent speed 
> which holds following vehicles up.
> I went through the tunnel at 6.30 am this morning and the traffic was 
> being held up by a moron in a white VT Commodore doing 65kph in the rh 
> lane so should all drivers of white Commodores be forced to stay out of 
> the rh lane?

*Anyone* not doing the speed limit should be out of the right hand lane,
and 
in particular trucks as they're usually not doing the limit through the 
tunnel.

> A better solution would be to force all cars to do a minimum speed,
idiots 
> in cars driving too slow are far greater problem than slow trucks and if

> the police actually enforced keep left rules for all vehicles there 
> wouldn't be any need for any stupid rules just for trucks.

Remember when we had "Trucks must use left two lanes" on the Westgate 
Bridge? It worked *great* when that was in effect. Now it's totally
*****ed* 
when you get 4 lanes of trucks crawling up the bridge with one going 2km/h

faster than the others who just *has* to be out in the right lane because
he 
can't be ****ed sitting in behind the others and waiting.

Like I said in another post, a moron is a moron regardless of what he 
drives. The problem with moronic truck drivers is that they have *far* 
greater potential to cause mayhem (as recent accidents in the tunnel have 
shown).

--
Regards,
Noddy.