"RogerM" <RogerM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13topjmjdfsdqad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry, I didn't notice I wrote the post specifically for you. The post
was
> not about me, but the part re****t I published. My comments were not to
be
> taken serious as if it was "my" road test.
So, what was it then? A random wank?
> Fortunately, there are more noteworthy recipients/contributors in here
> than you. As a matter of fact, your **** is at the point where it has
> become annoying and not the slightest bit funny.
Yeah, well, considering you're the butt of most of the jokes you're not
very
likely to find them all that amusing, eh? :)
> I have even credited you in the past with "congratulatory responses"
to
> the odd sensible post you rarely post, but you even have to be a ****ing
> smartarsed prick about that too.
I don't hide the fact that I'm an arsehole Roger, and you *know* that. If
it
gets up your nose, then you know what to do.
> I really don't know what kind of life you lead Noddy, but I'd be ****ed
if
> it can be a happy one.
It's a *very* happy one, but then you wouldn't have a clue.
> Does your missus mope around all day too looking to pull someone apart?
No, my missus mopes around all day waiting to tell me off for buying some
**** I don't need and can live without :)
> One thing I am sure of, it's ****s like you who hide behind usenet and
> I'll bet in the real world you are nothing but a wuss who would cry at
the
> first sign of getting a smack in the ear.
Feel free to put that theory to the practical test whenever you feel like.
--
Regards,
Noddy.
|
