Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Discussion ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 25 of 43 Topic 22353 of 24859
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

by Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 7, 2008 at 02:54 PM

On Apr 8, 4:18 am, "Noddy" <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Pit" <spamlis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:a75a8cf4-5acc-427e-9afb-9e40b0b06cb2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > In a what if moment  thought hang on ------ it is a sort of brumby
> > like thing but no 4wd . :(
>
> No it ain't. The Brumby was a decent car :)
>
> The Jumbuck is based on the Mitsubi**** Lancer, which to me is probably
the
> *last* car on earth you'd want to copy & modify as they were a ****** of
a
> car when Mitsubi**** made them. Having a bad car modified and built by
> someone like Proton is only going to add to the woes.
>
> Why you'd even consider one when any number of decent Hi-lux, Triton,
Navara
> or Rodeo utes can be had for that money is beyond me.
>
> Caveat emptor.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

They are not sitting in the back yard :)  Are you saying I could get
any 2007 models of those with 4000 K's for the same money ?
I have not looked to be honest  just tripped over this thing  as
described.

Other factor is it is able to fit under some gear that the above ones
don't  ( like Rotor blades)
Other main factor is  better half can use it as a shopping trolley and
cheaper to insure & run and less likely to be stolen ( bit like old
volvo 244's)

Its is just a shopping trolley and paddock basher  and cheaper on
tyres  etc

You are very correct on the Latin advice also  .
As I said was just looking for a tinkering project and add another
"orphan" to the collection :)
Cheers
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 12:33:03 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 06:18:21 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 02:06:30 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:50:25 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 10:06:18 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 20:20:55 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-04-09 18:43:42 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 19:12:05 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-09 21:01:26 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-04-09 21:55:19 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 23:54:25 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"RogerM" <Ro  2008-04-10 09:53:01 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 10:58:54 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"RogerM" <Ro  2008-04-10 11:10:46 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 11:34:32 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-10 04:14:20 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 14:23:02 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-10 04:28:56 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-04-10 03:10:04 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 14:21:10 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 22:56:02 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 22:56:48 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 13:27:34 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-04-07 14:01:36 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 14:54:42 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 08:19:52 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-08 06:59:39 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:54:20 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 03:55:37 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 06:03:03 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 17:50:13 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 23:57:55 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-04-07 16:03:38 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-04-07 23:55:41 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-04-08 01:32:43 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-08 01:42:26 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:46:34 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 06:12:12 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 18:00:51 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 19:23:00 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Dan--." <en  2008-04-10 02:35:04 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 19:26:58 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Dan--." <en  2008-04-10 17:36:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 19:03:40 CST 2008.