Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Discussion ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 36 of 43 Topic 22353 of 24856
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

by Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 8, 2008 at 01:42 AM

On Apr 8, 6:19 am, "Noddy" <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Pit" <spamlis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:b990cdbe-4b27-469b-995b-e4a514ce0354@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > They are not sitting in the back yard :)
>
> Oh, that makes them okay then :)
>
> > Are you saying I could get any 2007 models of those with 4000 K's for
the
> > same money ?
>
> No, I'm saying is what you'll get is a *better* vehicle for the same
money,
> regardless of it's age.
>
> If having a newer vehicle is more im****tant to you than having a better
> vehicle, then buy all means buy the Proton. However, if you're after
> something with a modi*** of quality attached to it, then buy anything
else.
>
> > Other factor is it is able to fit under some gear that the above ones
> > don't  ( like Rotor blades)
>
> I couldn't imagine a situation where a Proton ute would fit under
something
> that a tray backed Hi-lux/Rodeo/Triton/Navara et al wouldn't.
>
> > Other main factor is  better half can use it as a shopping trolley and
> > cheaper to insure & run and less likely to be stolen ( bit like old
> > volvo 244's)
>
> That's a bit like saying you're happy to wear gray vinyl slip on shoes
> because you can get them cheap :)
>
> > Its is just a shopping trolley and paddock basher  and cheaper on
> > tyres  etc
>
> Hey, if it blows your skirt up, then knock yourself out. I wouldn't be
> interested in one if they were giving them away for free, but that's
just
> me.
>
> However, if you're looking for a decent vehicle for the almost 8 grand
> you're contemplating on spending, then I could think of *plenty* that
would
> make the short list well ahead of anything made by Proton.
>
> The Lancer was a *****house* car. The Lancer as a work vehicle made by a
> manufacturer who is a hell of a lot cheaper & nastier than Mitsubi**** is
a
> frightening prospect indeed :)
>
> > As I said was just looking for a tinkering project and add another
> > "orphan" to the collection :)
>
> Then buy it, as I'm sure it'll keep you busy.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Noddy.

Cant as at 1600 today my time  it has been sold
Local bought it for his daughter   and wave it by by tomorrow when the
paperwork from the dealer arrives but have the crispies in my hand
Actually the thing drives a LOT better  than other proton products
had it full tilt sideways   and beat the v8 boys around the barrels
out on the clay plan .

They are not that bad  an apparently according to the bloke that
bought it   only about 15 k new on the road .

and even my old large long legged frame fits into the thing ok
---------

So with the profit  DISCLOSED to the neighbours    seesm they still
got a better deal than dicking about with the used car s*** down
south
happy as larry and save a few bob (which is  im****tant out here   as
still no bloody rain :(    )

Buyer was happy for dealer to make 700 and me 500    truth has its own
rewards eh . Turned out lesser models in used car yards  are still 5
or 6 grand above  what he paid  take off the repairs ( I was a bit
hard on it 800 to 1200) to spray & fix   bonnet d/s door   AND REPAIR
TAIL GATE

Oh and  few sides of sheep also swap hands  :) to all involved .

every one wins .
Sincere thanks into son of brumby idea . It is all too hard .
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 12:33:03 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 06:18:21 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 02:06:30 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:50:25 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 10:06:18 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 20:20:55 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-04-09 18:43:42 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 19:12:05 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-09 21:01:26 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-04-09 21:55:19 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 23:54:25 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"RogerM" <Ro  2008-04-10 09:53:01 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 10:58:54 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"RogerM" <Ro  2008-04-10 11:10:46 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 11:34:32 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-10 04:14:20 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 14:23:02 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-10 04:28:56 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-04-10 03:10:04 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 14:21:10 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 22:56:02 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 22:56:48 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 13:27:34 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-04-07 14:01:36 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 14:54:42 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 08:19:52 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-08 06:59:39 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:54:20 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 03:55:37 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 06:03:03 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 17:50:13 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 23:57:55 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-04-07 16:03:38 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-04-07 23:55:41 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-04-08 01:32:43 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-08 01:42:26 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:46:34 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 06:12:12 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 18:00:51 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 19:23:00 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Dan--." <en  2008-04-10 02:35:04 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 19:26:58 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Dan--." <en  2008-04-10 17:36:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 18:21:21 CST 2008.