Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Discussion ...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Post A New Topic

Post a Reply

Post 21 of 43 Topic 22353 of 24848

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

by "Noddy" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM

"Athol" <athol_SPIT_SPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1207649179.50136@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Daryl Walford <dwalford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Athol wrote:
>
>>> OTOH, if Proton had a clue, they'd throw the AWD drivetrain in and
>>> market it as the modern day brumby.
>
>> That would be a good idea but at the same time they would need to add
at
>> least an extra 40kw, 64kw isn't enough.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> The problem is that proton don't appear to have a clue...
>
> -- 
> Athol
> <http://cust.idl.com.au/athol>
  Linux Registered User # 254000
> I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

43 Posts in Topic:

Discussion proton Jumbuck

Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL

2008-04-07 12:33:03

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-08 06:18:21

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM

2008-04-08 02:06:30

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-08 19:50:25

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM

2008-04-08 10:06:18

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-08 20:20:55

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

John_H <john4721@[EMAI

2008-04-09 18:43:42

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-09 19:12:05

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-09 21:01:26

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Kwyjibo" <k

2008-04-09 21:55:19

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO

2008-04-09 23:54:25

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"RogerM" <Ro

2008-04-10 09:53:01

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-10 10:58:54

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"RogerM" <Ro

2008-04-10 11:10:46

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-10 11:34:32

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Atheist Chaplain&qu

2008-04-10 04:14:20

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-10 14:23:02

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Atheist Chaplain&qu

2008-04-10 04:28:56

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

John McKenzie <jmac_me

2008-04-10 03:10:04

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-10 14:21:10

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-08 22:56:02

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-08 22:56:48

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM

2008-04-08 13:27:34

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

the_dawggie <the_dawgg

2008-04-07 14:01:36

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL

2008-04-07 14:54:42

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-08 08:19:52

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Klompmeester"

2008-04-08 06:59:39

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-08 19:54:20

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO

2008-04-09 03:55:37

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Klompmeester"

2008-04-09 06:03:03

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-09 17:50:13

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO

2008-04-09 23:57:55

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

jackbadger56 <castle56

2008-04-07 16:03:38

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Dan--- <enter.email@[E

2008-04-07 23:55:41

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Dan--- <enter.email@[E

2008-04-08 01:32:43

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL

2008-04-08 01:42:26

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-08 19:46:34

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Klompmeester"

2008-04-09 06:12:12

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

Daryl Walford <dwalfor

2008-04-09 18:00:51

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Klompmeester"

2008-04-09 19:23:00

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Dan--." <en

2008-04-10 02:35:04

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Noddy" <me@

2008-04-10 19:26:58

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

"Dan--." <en

2008-04-10 17:36:34

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 10:49:39 CST 2008.