Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Australian Cars > Re: Discussion ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 43 Topic 22353 of 24848
Post > Topic >>

Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck

by "Kwyjibo" <kwyjibo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 9, 2008 at 09:55 PM

"Noddy" <me@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47fca208$0$12674$c30e37c6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Daryl Walford" <dwalford@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:N5-dncxXAcT3FWHanZ2dnUVZ_u7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Good point but if they had paid as much attention with the actual
vehicle 
>> as they did with the name they could have had a big seller instead of a

>> vehicle that sells in very small numbers.
>
> I think that even though they're an average vehicle as far as quality 
> goes, it's a very niche market that wouldn't see huge numbers of these 
> types of vehicles on the roads if more people made them. The original 
> Brumby was (and still is in my opinion) about the best of the "small
utes"

WHAT??? Are you forgetting the "Mighty Boy"?? :-)
I know Suzuki would like to (forget it, that is.....)

-- 
Kwyj.
 




 43 Posts in Topic:
Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 12:33:03 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 06:18:21 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 02:06:30 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:50:25 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 10:06:18 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 20:20:55 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
John_H <john4721@[EMAI  2008-04-09 18:43:42 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 19:12:05 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-09 21:01:26 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Kwyjibo" <k  2008-04-09 21:55:19 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 23:54:25 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"RogerM" <Ro  2008-04-10 09:53:01 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 10:58:54 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"RogerM" <Ro  2008-04-10 11:10:46 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 11:34:32 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-10 04:14:20 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 14:23:02 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-10 04:28:56 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
John McKenzie <jmac_me  2008-04-10 03:10:04 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 14:21:10 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 22:56:02 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 22:56:48 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Athol <athol_SPIT_SPAM  2008-04-08 13:27:34 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
the_dawggie <the_dawgg  2008-04-07 14:01:36 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-07 14:54:42 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-08 08:19:52 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-08 06:59:39 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:54:20 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 03:55:37 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 06:03:03 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 17:50:13 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Kev <kevcat@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-09 23:57:55 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
jackbadger56 <castle56  2008-04-07 16:03:38 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-04-07 23:55:41 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Dan--- <enter.email@[E  2008-04-08 01:32:43 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Pit <spamlister@[EMAIL  2008-04-08 01:42:26 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-08 19:46:34 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 06:12:12 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
Daryl Walford <dwalfor  2008-04-09 18:00:51 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Klompmeester"   2008-04-09 19:23:00 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Dan--." <en  2008-04-10 02:35:04 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Noddy" <me@  2008-04-10 19:26:58 
Re: Discussion proton Jumbuck
"Dan--." <en  2008-04-10 17:36:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 17:47:20 CST 2008.