Re: Which of the two faced

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:32:06 GMT, "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

><OzOne> wrote in message
news:78na04lai8a82vl67qvo6lhtggq7d25crb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:28:37 GMT, "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>do you even know why his nic is Pit you complete ****wit,
>>
>> Seems he doesn't either as he's posted as Pitt, Pits and Pit....
>>
>>> using that logic
>>>the same could be said because you don't know how to capitalise Ozone!
>>
>> I capitalise OzOne as I choose.....and to borrow a statement...do you
>> even know why my nic is OzOne
>
>no but then I'm not the one making statements about someone elses nic
that 
>are based on assumptions, I was also pointing out the simple fact (I have
to 
>keep it simple because after all I am trying to explain something to you)

>using the same locic you used to ASSUME that Phil couldnt spell Pitts
(I'm 
>sure you though it was something to do with air craft) we could derive
that 
>you were unable to properly capitolise Ozone (the poisonous gas that I'm 
>sure everyone assumes you named yourself after)

I'd be happy if you'd explain where he got the nic Pit, Pitt and Pits
from...after all you are so close....
>
>you complete ****wit,(except that I'll
>> use a question mark for the question)
>>
>
>my "Complete ****wit" was a statement of fact so no question mark is 
>required :-)

Then maybe the "do you even know why" bit should have been dropped
from your 'statement' as well....cocksucker.
>
>
>>>from what I have read in aus.aviation Phil is far more respected and 
>>>trusted
>>>then you could ever hope to be in a million lifetimes,
>>
>> Yes, I gathered that you don't know him..
>>
>
>more than you do it seems, but then were talking facts here again,
something 
>you only have a passing interest in, but I'm sure in your fantasy world,
you 
>think people respect you, and for you, thats all that realy matters :-)

I'm positive people respect me.....Pity you when they know what a
snivelling arselicker you are.
>
>>> so I guess when it
>>>comes down to who we will believe, I guess the one with the track
record 
>>>of
>>>trust and integrity will always beat the one with the track record of
>>>bull**** and fact dodging
>>
>> Yes, I can see how you'd think like that.
>>
>> Better get onto him and get him to check with his mate in Pago
>> Pago...again..or even ... now.
>>
>> Bwaaahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhaha!
>>
>>
>
>its a bit hard when he is currently in Singa****e, but he might be Home
late 
>Wednesday, Thursday at the latest, I'm sure he can respond to your
conserns 
>then :-)

What?
You mean you need to check with mummy?

Grow a spine you gutter crawling slime.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**