Re: Which of the two faced

Noddy wrote:
> 
> "Pit" <spamlister@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:0bac1df4-75f1-4c88-a9ac-8742bca9907b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> > Thus facts are
> > 1 Archer mentioned in posts is not his
> 
> We all knew that regardless of whether he actually said it is or not :)
> 
> > 2 No one appears to know why he suddenly posted that article without
> > background on an aviation group  ( The post it may be said just fell
> > from the sky )
> 
> It's standard behaviour.
> 
> He has a habit of bragging about completely irrelevant issues with
enough
> ambiguity to choke a buzzard, and when the bull**** gets a it too thick
even
> for him he changes decks and starts playing the pedantic cards.
> 
> He does it so often you can almost predict the *hour* of the day he'll
make
> the switch.

You could probably overlay that data with when the local chemist
schedules methadone doses.

 
> If you hang around here long enough you'll discover a few things about
this
> twonk. (a) He's completely full of ****, (b) he *thrives* on being the
> centre of attention regardless of how much hostility may be directed
towards
> him, and (c) he's completely delusional in that he honestly thinks there
are
> people here who believe what he says.

There are - his sock puppets. 

He actually reeks of a twat with rich parents who bought him the latest
computers (and other ****) from an early age, and instead of doing
something with it, he (using other peoples work) tried various malicious
hacking attempts, and is now relegated to the pissweak multiple alter
ego usenet troll post status, which is about the equivalent of the
person who licks Kim Joong Il's frangers clean, because they have a
materials shortage up there.

Anyone else given a similar op****tunity would actually have made good on
it. Even Pat :)

 The reality is that he's a ****ing
> moron with absolutely zero credibility, and most people around here
wouldn't
> piss on the bloke if he was on fire in the gutter.

Marshmellows anyone? 

> He'll no doubt reply to this with some kind of name calling rant that
makes
> about as much sense as an ejector seat on a helicopter,

I no longer see the posts but I do recall when he was caught red handed,
out came the less common (from him anyway) insults and vulgarity,
obviously it got through to him, and he was reeling from the breadth and
depth of the assault. He's never been the same since. To be fair, Blue
Heeler deserves some credit there, whomever he might turn out to be in
real life. He waited patiently, and struck like a kung fu grand master.
In response, Oz did a microsoft, redefined the industry standard as
darkness and hoped like hell nobody noticed.

Fact is, he hated himself _even more_ that day, and from that day forth.

> The fact that 99% of the regulars around here refuse to have anything to
do
> with the silly **** speaks volumes, and a *lot* of them are decent
people
> who will go out of their way to help anyone.

What is this mythical group you speak of?


-- 
John McKenzie

tosspam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 vice.president@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 president@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 uce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  world's #1 sardine whisperer root@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
$USER@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 $LOGNAME@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -h1024@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 fraudinfo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 abuse@[EMAIL PROTECTED]