In article <bf0ef801-ebd8-4d7d-ae6f-
3374f7b24c03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, the_dawggie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> On Apr 17, 1:42 am, Diesel Damo <Diesel_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > atec77 wrote:
> > > Might allow you to tinker and then decide if you have a small soft
drink
> > > bottle
> >
> > >http://www.brisbanebiodiesel.com/reactor-design.php
> >
> > Love it! Especially this bit: "Typically the glycerine layer is about
> > the same or a bit more than the amount of methanol used."
> >
> > So far I hadn't been able to find out how much of everything is
> > actually produced at the end, so that little tidbit of info is very
> > welcome.
>
> Yup, overall volume stays more or less the same. A hot water
> system - I didn't think of that.
>
I don't think this method of producing fuel would help me or be cost
effective.
I mean.. for one, I'd have to go out and buy a stinking particulate
emitting diesel :-)
I guess I could use it on an old bit of denim/cotton or screwed up
newspaper to start the charcoal BBQ.
Flawed theory: Charcoal doesn't burn if you drop a match on it, therefore
charcoal doesn't burn.
Al
--
I don't take sides.
It's more fun to insult everyone.
http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
|
