Re: Which of the two faced

On Apr 18, 8:32 am, OzOne wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT), Pit <spamlis...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Apr 17, 2:45 pm, OzOne wrote:
> >> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:33:27 GMT, "Atheist Chaplain" <abu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> ><OzOne> wrote in
messagenews:8gkd049raa4jmhg0l6f193flu5be99bphm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:22:49 GMT, "Atheist Chaplain"
<abu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >>>I'm sure you took the time to check as well :-)
> >> >>>let me know when your Archer III lands in Sydney, I might come
down to see
> >> >>>the handover :-)
>
> >> >> You truly ARE dumber than sterile dirt!
> >> >> The Archer is going to Auckland as I've said before.
>
> >> >> Apparently your exalted leader will be there to take pics for
you....
>
> >> >> OzOne of the three twins
>
> >> >> I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
> >> >> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
>
> >> >Well one would think that because you keep telling us that it is
your
> >> >aircraft, it would be safe to assume that it would be coming to
Australia.
> >> >but then I suppose this is one way you can try and avoid up close
and
> >> >personal scrutiny, never mind, I have friends in Auckland, they
might even
> >> >keep an eye on the transfer of rego from N1005J to ZK-xxx, should be
a
> >> >simple matter to then find the owner ;-)
> >> >but then again, your the expert here at avoidance and side stepping,
it
> >> >would never be safe to think logically when your concerned.
> >> >but I'm sure you will have some little semantic sidestep up your
sleeve :-)
>
> >> You sir are a lying sack of ****!
>
> >> I have NEVER said that the Archer is mine, NEVER!!!!
> >> and if you took just a little time to actually read my posts before
> >> replying you may (though I doubt your abilities to comprehend
> >> anything) be a little better informed
>
> >> First mention of the aircraft being "your Archer" is in the post
> >> above...your words!! (which I expect you'll snip before you reply)
>
> >> I suggest you take a little time to check your facts and my
statements
> >> before further confirming your stupidity!
>
> >> OzOne of the three twins
>
> >> I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
> >> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
>
> >Actually the chap is CORRECT    Ozone  never "wrote" that it was his.
> >Thus it is now clear the Archer (actually an Archer III)  if it is a
> >brand newie
> >is thus not his .
>
> Indeed it is new, Piper will have some rather large bills to pay.
>
>
>
> >Guess the thread ends here . Ozone  having made reference to being
> >correct when writing posts,as he has pointed out to others. May take
> >the came care to avoid confusion over his posts  in the future.
>
> >Thus facts are
> >1 Archer mentioned in posts is not his
> >2 No one appears to know why he suddenly posted that article without
> >background on an aviation group  ( The post it may be said just fell
> >from the sky )
>
> Actually it was a mistake on my part....I usually post to that and
> other groups using a different name, and this was an interesting tale.


***  REALLY  and what name /s would they be ?