by "Peter Jason" <pj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Apr 25, 2008 at 11:12 AM
The advantages of top posting are that one is
spared the tedium of reading all the verbiage
underneath.
Then it is easier to answer the question the
OP *should* have asked.
"TG'sFM" <suvvdj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:2cd4857c-6710-4f9a-a35d-a07d156d1df2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 25, 5:35 am, Polly the Parrot
> <flatulantdi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
>> "TG'sFM" <suv...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > > I don't have any decendants (at least
>> > > not yet).
>> > > But I do have an ancestor that was at
>> > > Galipolli :-)
>>
>> > That probably explains why you are a top
>> > poster.
>>
>> Where did he/she top post?
>
> Well you'd hardly call it a bottom post
> would you? There is never
> ever any justification to leave ANY of the
> other persons text below
> what you type - never. To do so, you will
> be labelled a top poster,
> and always risk of having your access
> privilages revolked.
